“This step is necessary to prove I’m not a bot,” wrote the bot as it passed an anti-AI screening step.
Makes sense.
- Google’s “anti bot” verification has long been considered woefully inadequate.
- It works largely by tracking how long the user takes to click on it.
- LLMs are inherently fuzzy and for a bot, incredibly slow.
Meanwhile google slapped me with nine captchas to fill out a form like wtf?
Lemme guess… traffic lights, too many motorcycles, and buses? There was something “wrong” with your cookies cache or IP. Google just straight fucks with you if it sees network traffic it doesn’t like.
Google hates non chromium browsers
“Hold on, you gotta wait for another picture of a bus to load. Nevermind that it now inexplicably takes 10 seconds to load the fucking picture”
I think there’s a tampermonkey script that skips the “loading” time. It’s jarring but it works.
i never know what’s expected on those type of captcha. if the handle bars of a bike go into an adjacent box and are 99% covered by a hand does that count? what do you do when you have a blurry image full of jpg artifacts and are asked to identify if it contains a fire hydrant. I’m pretty sure it usually classifies me as a bot for being too exact since I’m asked follow ups for a few minutes until i give up and just close the tab out of annoyance.
That’s kind of the point, though. You’re teaching their AI how to make those decisions.
Am I? Or does it think I’m a bot?
I guess it’s on brand for Google to try and squeeze more value out of a product by making it worse for users. Just like Prabhakar Raghavan ruined Google search.
They almost always know whether or not you’re a bot before you get to any of those pictures. Making you deal with the pictures is how they “pay” for the capcha.
You’ll notice most of the images are related to traffic. That’s training data for their self driving cars.
Fuck that I might as well answer them wrong then. Bullshit
Unfortunately, they thought of that. Some of them are known answers that they use to be sure you’re answering honestly. They’ll fail you on those even though they know you’re not a bot.
My son was looking over my shoulder, or vice-versa, while I bitched about that. It was bikes or motorcycles and I’d always click if I thought there was any amount of it in a picture. He told me not to be so precise, as in, if there’s a tiny bit of handlebar, didn’t count it. That seems to work better… unless it doesn’t like my VPN or whatever, in which case it’s never ending
Something I find really funny is that my residential IP gets flagged 80x more often than any VPN’s IPs I’ve tried.
Although as soon as I see “Please try again” on a captcha, I leave the site. I got stuck on one for like 10 minutes before I finally gave up
Also Anubis means I can’t access websites that use it because I run noscript and Nepenthes breaks my self-hosted search engine
Guys, I think all those things to “verify if you’re humans” are hmm… doing something else ?
Meanwhile my ass is in tears every time I have to do a fucking “click all the squares that show a motorcycle” prompt. Maybe I should just join the bots.
Ooh, sorry, you missed the single pixel on the corner of the adjacent tile, FAIL
You didn’t miss it the second time, ALSO FAIL
Well now you can just have a bot do that for you
There was a really interesting video (can’t remember the title) that went into Google’s captcha specifically, and found that it really isn’t designed to detect bots. It’s designed to detect a unique digital fingerprint that can be used by advertisers.
So, you can use a really simple mouse script to click the checkbox automatically with no issue, but as soon as you use a VPN you get served with the photo games. It doesn’t care if you’re a robot, it cares if you’re a valuable ad target.
This video is excellent
On another note
The internet is becoming a nightmare
I need to escape
ESCAPE AAAAAAAHHHHHHHHGo outside?
And do what ? Walk down the road into darkness ? There is nothing. The only walkable land here is the side of the road, everywhere else is trespass. In all directions for at least 30 kilometers. Even the wild forests are owned, not that there is anything there to see or do.
We have to face it, the internet is where other people are.
Inside the prison.Knowing the geocaching community there will still somehow be geocaches in your area
LLM is a model/algorithm and the robot is an automatic machine. LLM is not a robot. All is ok.
Oh. Well, I was worried for a bit but you’ve put my heart at ease.
Now that we’ve made our problems go away by redefining them, I’m ready to tackle
cancer, a natural body resource management issue.</s> [and assuming parent comment is also </s> in spite of
Poe’s LawNathan’s astute online parody observations]Yes. Exactly this. No way for a bot to make an API call to a LLM and get back a solution formatted in JSON that it could easily parse for the solution. Could never happen.
Prowlarr has had a thing to do this for a good while now. No AI needed.
Probably because it accessed it through a user’s browser/connection which until that point hadn’t been flagged as a bot and had consistently shown signs of human use.
I’m sure if you set up a bot farm with this your connections would be flagged very quickly.
Wow, agents built to monitor and reflect human behaviour, accurately model and reproduce human behaviour.
This is what is what shits me off when people complain “Oh this AI isn’t real AI” or “This isn’t consciousness” The limiting factor is is the training data. Humans have just had a few more million years of training data passed on through genetics. It’s replication and fakery all the way down. If this is you, if you fucking need the reassurance that you are better at being fucking conscious compare to a machine fuck the fuck right off and go do something amazing with it then. Compose something. Create something. Feel the wind in your hair and the sand at your feet. Fuck off, we’re all dirt.
What does being able to fill a captcha have to do with consciousness? “Wow the ai being good at this pattern matching task surely is proof of it being humanlike because humans are also good at pattern matching!” Is such a stretch, dude.
… That’s a lot of expletives for anyone who might have a differing opinion about the nature of consciousness or reality.
Noted.
I calmed down and started searching for some recommendations to counter this view.
Although at the moment I still think The Chinese Room argument doesn’t prove what Searle thinks it does.
