• CommanderCloon@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Why is it described as a Russian cosmodrome instead of a Kazakh one? Is Russia the exclusive user of the launch pad?

  • Blizzard@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    9 hours ago

    russia is the definition of failure. I guarantee you that some of those nukes they keep trying to scare civilized countries would fail too and blow up in their face.

    • j5906@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Russia has deployed 72 times to the ISS, there was only one failed attempt but the astronauts survived unharmed. I wouldnt call that the definition of failure and I wouldnt risk to find out about their nuclear capabilities (other than knowing they exploded the biggest bomb ever), but you do you…

      • Ember James@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        7 hours ago

        I am tired of the “Russia’s nukes don’t work” narrative as well. Even if 99% were indeed duds, they own (and actively maintain) some of the most powerful weapons on the planet. The only thing we have going for us is MAD, and that isn’t a great option especially for the hundreds of countries without nukes.