

Even if the claim ends up being true, you can literally just read the messages that were sent and realize see that the summary was wrong.
Even if the claim ends up being true, you can literally just read the messages that were sent and realize see that the summary was wrong.
Remember when they named their voice assistant after a video game character?
'96 is often cited as the cutoff year for millennial, so they’d be mixed 29/30.
Sms/iMessage typically. I started using WhatsApp because my wife’s from south America, where they commonly use it.
Friend, I think you need to reconsider your world perspective a bit. Not everyone is out to get you all the time.
It wouldn’t be lemmy if we weren’t always in a moral size measuring contest.
I don’t agree at all, the hype was evident, sure, but the procedural generation was largely the reason people didn’t like the game.
You stated that procedural generation isn’t hated, but ‘botching’ the usage of it at release is the piece that irrelevant. The people hated it because of the, admittably bad, procedural generation.
Local lemmy user offended on behalf of your sister for a joke told 10 years ago.
More at 11.
Like procedural generation, generative assets that are done well will be either indistinguishable from hand work, likely because there will be some involved, or will be incorporated in a way that they mesh well with everything else.
Everyone hated the procedural generation in no man’s sky, for example, until enough work was done to make that just a piece of the game.
Fake stuff? Next you’ll tell me that the dragons in that new How to Train Your Dragon movie aren’t really dragons.