Cethin

Again, GUI is faster to learn, CLI is faster to use.

TLDR really helps though, rather than man pages.

First I want to point out you aren’t asking for proof against it, but fine.

I can’t find exactly what I’m looking for, because Mamdani said “globalize the antifada,” but here’s the DNC chair not speaking against that at least. He’s said basically that Democrats need to support him no matter what before, but this is the big thing right now that’s making it hard to search for.

I’m much further left than the DNC (social anarchist), but “the party” is mostly doing the right thing here. That’s not to say the donors are though. I think most of the monied people are with Cuomo.

I got it for free on Epic. I launched it and something wasn’t working right, and tried a few different Proton versions. Then it just would launch because Denuvo thought it was different systems. I thought I’d come back later and try it, once that wore off, but I never did and probably never will, so the game wasn’t even worth trying it for free for me. Lol. Maybe I’ll try it some day, but I doubt it.

To an extent, sure, but surprisingly a lot of the DNC have backed him up. Give them credit where it’s due, which isn’t often so it doesn’t take much effort. If you give them shit for stuff they aren’t doing then they have no reason to not do the bad stuff, because it has the same result.

Yeah, easier to learn, slower to use.

If that’s all it is then it’s not that bad (though unelectable in Texas). I suspect it’s much worse though.

Buy indie games that are actually trying to make good games and do cool things though.

Isn’t before the price is set in stone the time to make a big deal out of it? Like you said, they probably leaked it to gauge the response. We should mock it for the absurdity that it is so they know they’re way off the mark before it comes out.

That is, assume the price is something we want changed. Honestly, I don’t really. I want this to flop. We need fewer Microsoft products out there, not more. I want people on Linux powered devices, so we get more support for Linux software.

It also requires perfectly rational actors with perfect information. If they can suppress information about competition or manipulate you to have loyalty then it doesn’t work, and both of these happen constantly.

What the other comment said is correct. It alone doesn’t show they’re doing fine. They could instead have a massive decrease in imports, and their export surplus would increase, but it’d suck because no one actually cares about that. I don’t get upset when I go to the grocery store and leave with less money than when I entered, because I got goods of similar value with that money.

If their total exports went up, then that indicates they’re doing well.

GUI is often faster to learn, but CLI is almost always faster to use. It’s the argument people use for why they choose it. You don’t have to move your mouse to click on buttons that can be anywhere. You just type. With tab completion, it’s significantly faster.

(There is a secondary argument for CLI for tutorials, in that it’s going to be the same or similar for everyone.)

Yeah, this is legitimately an amazing ad, though Google may bot want it because they probably make more money off your data than you buying the device.

The thing is we can gather that solar energy from other locations too. We can harvest wind and hydro, which are just solar power in a different form. We can gather solar energy that’s deposited off of our site in this way.

But that’s not the reason for “you are!” It’s because you used to be plural! We stopped using it for plural and it’s exclusively singular now, yet it maintains the plural grammar.

It used to be “thou art” for second person singular and “you are” for second person plural. Now it’s “you are” for second person singular and usually “you all/y’all are” or “you guys are,” but sometimes “you are,” for second person plural. “They are” is in good company.

Grammar and language are made up. Stop arguing about the rules and just use it in the way that’s useful for communication with your contemporaries, or if you are going to argue about “maintaining the purity of the rules” then start using “thou art” for second person plural, so your peers can understand you.

It’s because “they is” is not correct usage, even if it’s used as singular, just as “you is” isn’t. Saying “they is” makes it sound like you’re pointing out that it doesn’t work so therefor it must be plural. It’s “they are” even if used as singular.

I’m not the one disregarding the grammar rules. You are.

You are.

You, in this case, is singular. Why are you using are?!

It turns out, “the issues this causes for clarity in language” don’t actually matter, and it doesn’t cause any issues. It’s perfectly clear “you” and “they” here are singular, despite the plural grammar. It is not confusing, as you clearly proved in your own comment by using “you are.”

No, you dummy. The reason we use “are” with “you” is because it was originally plural. However, language is mutable and ever-changing. You is almost exclusively used as singular now, yet it keeps the plural “are”. The point being, your statement that “they is” is wrong doesn’t prove anything. We use the “wrong” grammar for words all the time and we don’t care, until you can do it to hurt someone.

But they’re not covering it up perfectly, as this post shows. They’re trying to, make they’ve made mistakes.

You’re literally on a thread about evidence of tampering with the video. There’s a section if the video that’s missing. If that isn’t evidence of them covering something up I don’t know what is. Do you not see it because you don’t want to or do you actually not think that shows there’s something going on?

I would assume it’s to make the metadata seem more reasonable, so people pay less attention to the cut. ‘The “perfectly innocent” act of “touching it up” is the reason the metadata says what it does, not because we removed part of it. Don’t look any closer!’