

You may want to keep on reading. There’s more.


You may want to keep on reading. There’s more.


However everything I’m finding is listed as intended for switches/routers
They reuse the same casing.
You can check the pattern, but those ears should mount just fine on it.


The problem in there is corporations. AI is just the means of the dickery, not the cause.
I would also go further and say the root cause is capitalism, and that someone being able to eat or be housed should not be based on whether or not their art has met the criteria for corporate purchase. But I digress.


Expanded rest API, an MCP, and the webhook options and integrations are significantly expanded.


AI/LLM coding assistance is permitted but the author must understand/review the patch and take responsibility – including that the contribution is LGPLv2.1+ compatible. The NetworkManager policy also will not allow AI assistance in communication for the upstreaming/review of said patches.


Actually given that, if you have a weekly with AI as part of it, tagging [AIT] will allow people to filter it out.
Its pretty ancillary to the newsletter itself so its not really required, but just to mention… if it were tagged, any low effort comments like “slop” or similar would then be removed. I don’t really see that on your posts in general though, so more a thought for later should it become a problem.


Its not really accurate.
There are 3 sites, the primary r&d all happens in Cupertino, but the second largest r&d is out of Herzliya, Israel, and the third largest is back in California at San Diego.
The architecture is licensed from ARM, so UK there, and production is by TSMC, mostly Taiwain and expanding into Arizona.
As I understand it, the facility in Israel is responsible for architecture design related to components like camera sensor architecture, WiFi, etc. Apple bought Israeli companies to do this.


I’ll have to go with “confirmed to have a severe misunderstanding” then.


I think you have a severe misunderstanding of what was said.


Please tag your post ( [CBH] or [AIP] ) and if AI was used, add the disclosure
See rules 7&8 and message with any questions
Thanks!


I think you’re confused about the AI involvement here.
AI was used to check for cheating in a remote exam. The percentages that passed were several times more than in previous years, while 2% got tossed for “unspecified conduct issues”.
Assuming those 2% were actually cheating and not the AI making a mistake is the issue.
These were multiple choice exams. There was no ability to copy/paste from an LLM. Could they have used another computer/monitor to look things up? Absolutely, but hardly relevant to the issue.


Or important supplies, like diapers, baby formula, etc.
Telemetry is one reason.
Not having to worry about the service shutting down (Google Reader) is another.
Synced read status is a common one as well.
You may also use it in combination with another service to create RSS feeds for sites that dont have one.
Honestly having it not just get killed like Google Reader is a big chunk of the userbase.
Edit: Completely misread things, I thought you had 192.168.10.0 and 192.168.20.0. Yes it would be the whole subnet for a /24, if you wanted less you’d go higher as mentioned.
192.168.0.0/29 would include 192.168.0.1-192.168.0.7.
/28 would get you up to 192.168.0.15.
No, /24 is just 256 IPs.
192.168.0.0/24 = 192.168.0.0 mask 255.255.255.0, or 192.168.0.1-192.168.0.254.
If you want 192.168.0.0 through, say, 192.168.7.254, you need to cover 2k ip’s, which is a /21. The mask would be 255.255.248.0.
A /24 would only be the last octet.
Third party apps haven’t been a thing for a while, people were saving snaps without notifying the user who sent the pictures, resulting in the whole thing going against their purpose (and why they got popular - mostly sending nudes because they disappeared).
So they cracked down pretty hard.
In terms of privacy, assume nothing on the platform is private.


Then you are missing the [CBH] tag.


Please tag per rule 7, and if its an AI-involved project, add the disclosure per rule 8.


If its a single image, I’d agree. If its a compose with multiple images though, better off combining into a single lxc or VM.


I got so annoyed when work tossed a system with that case. It was supposed to be set aside, but someone missed the memo.
To your side note, the DSA does advocate for an end to capitalism.
https://www.dsausa.org/about-us/what-is-democratic-socialism/
Edit: Just to mention, the Democratic Socialist Organizing Committee (DSOC) is what formed the DSA, and the DSOC was a split from the Socialist Party of America (SPA) due to the the SPA being “obsessively anticommunist” (in quotes but the exact quote may be a little different, I’d have to look it up to check).