

The question makes perfect sense
No, it does not, and I explained it multiple times and even made comparisons to help understanding the issue.
This is effectively the same question, as a period of time that long may as well be infinite to us.
No it’s. This reply is proof you didn’t understand the issue I brought up. Even if the universe exists for an infinite time, that has nothing to do with the issue I was talking about.
Okay, add another hypothetical to circumvent this.
You changed the question. That is not what the question in the original post and the article is about.
This is the exact same question
It’s not. You crafted a new question with new rules, just to justify for you to have right in a discussion you do not understand.
an unnecessary added layer of philosophical baggage that you wont engage without for some reason
The issue I brought up is not unnecessary and this is not just philosophical. It is core to the logic and thought process.











No. I think I explained it enough, that you just can go back and read and take your time. No need to be sarcastic.
It does. And no, it would not be your afterlife. You are dead. It’s a new life form based on your memories, but its not you. Think of you create a robot and you give a backup of your memory after you die. The new robot is not you. But I guess you don’t understand the issue here, no matter how often I explain it.
You cannot live in an afterlife, after your death. A copy of you is not you. That’s why the initial question doesn’t make sense to answer and I tried to explain why. It’s not my problem that most people ignore or don’t care about this.