I’ve been using one but I’m not sure what benefits I’m getting from it. I feel like the only thing happening is I’m adding a little bit of latency to all my requests for no reason.
I’ve been using one but I’m not sure what benefits I’m getting from it. I feel like the only thing happening is I’m adding a little bit of latency to all my requests for no reason.
Pros:
Cons:
Things to look out for when choosing a VPN provider:
Mullvad is the gold standard for VPNs in my book
It matches all the criteria I outlined. IVPN too btw: https://www.ivpn.net/
They’re also on Mastodon, which is also a plus in my opinion (not really significant though) @ivpn@mastodon.social
The fact that they allow you to order a physical voucher with a product key, and that product key serves as your only authentication makes it especially anonymous. I love it.
And ProtonVPN IMO.
Yeah. Proton, Mullvad and IVPN are the three best providers out there. That’s also why they’re recommended by privacy/security enthusiasts: https://www.privacyguides.org/en/vpn/?h=vpn#recommended-providers
In the cons there’s also an increase of the attack surface since you’ll be using a program to run the VPN
On the pros, some offer DNS blocking
WireGuard is now even part of the Linux kernel. The protocol and the reference implementation are fully open source, you can just download a WG profile from your provider and you won’t even have to use their application.
You can also set that up without a VPN, or independently of your VPN. The standard WireGuard client doesn’t interfere with your DNS setup.
Wireguard and openvpn both have open source clients.
That may make it more secure than other clients, but the surface is still larger. Any time you add an executable