Some lawmakers think additional guardrails are needed for future uses. For now, the facility will use AI to comply with regulations
Some lawmakers think additional guardrails are needed for future uses. For now, the facility will use AI to comply with regulations
My company recently released a beta “AI” tool to do similar.
What I’ve found but was 0% surprised by, our documentation has conflicts. It still takes an experienced, knowledgeable person to notice that there’s a conflict, then dive into source documentation to resolve them.
What going to happen is they think they can cheap out on hiring/retaining employees with those abilities.
I would bet a dollar the documentation in nuclear has similar conflicts and similar if not greater experienced human knowledge to resolve them.
I also do auditing/compliance and I would love to be a fly on the wall while they explain the chain of logic and objective evidence that it works leading to offloading tasks to AI.
The closest conflicts I have seen is varying codes required and there is usually clear language to use the strictest code. For example one code might require piping with 1/8” thickness if it holds water at X pressure and another will requires 3/16” thickness if that water is going to have a chloride content above X amount so you if it meets both you use the 3/16”.