Skiluros@sh.itjust.worksBanned from community to World News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoWeapons of war are launching from Cape Canaveral for the first time since 1988arstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square10linkfedilinkarrow-up196arrow-down13
arrow-up193arrow-down1external-linkWeapons of war are launching from Cape Canaveral for the first time since 1988arstechnica.comSkiluros@sh.itjust.worksBanned from community to World News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square10linkfedilink
minus-squareAndy@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9·1 year ago$41M per missile? And 300 of them? Sheeet. That’s over ten billion dollars? Am I mathing right? That’s a lotta dough.
minus-squareSkiluros@sh.itjust.worksBanned from communityOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·1 year agoThat’s not out of this world for the type of tech that is being discussed, especially considering costs in the US are very high.
minus-squaretechnocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down2·1 year ago That’s not out of this world for the type of tech genocidal empire
minus-squareAndy@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 year agoIt’s like half of NASA’s entire budget. From a risk mitigation perspective, this is a case of fighting the last war. We know the war that is coming: it’s climate collapse. We don’t need faster rockets, we need high speed rail.
$41M per missile? And 300 of them?
Sheeet. That’s over ten billion dollars?
Am I mathing right? That’s a lotta dough.
That’s not out of this world for the type of tech that is being discussed, especially considering costs in the US are very high.
It’s like half of NASA’s entire budget.
From a risk mitigation perspective, this is a case of fighting the last war. We know the war that is coming: it’s climate collapse. We don’t need faster rockets, we need high speed rail.