Originally this was a reply to this article about a Windows feature called Recall, but there’s a good argument the author’s concerns resonate far beyond Windows and Meta to proprietary generally.

      • albert180@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        edit-2
        18 hours ago

        Well, their “customisation” of Gnome with that ugly bar on the left side is still ugly as hell.

        And GCHQ isn’t also really trustworthy, with them being part of 5 Eyes

        • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          18 hours ago

          That’s part of why I use Xubuntu/Kubuntu mainly and Lubuntu for real low end stuff. Straight vanilla Ubuntu is… not super appealing. Ubuntu server that’s just CLI/headless though, that’s pretty tits, imho.

          • Godort@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            17 hours ago

            Ubuntu server is okay, but I’ve come to really appreciate a minimal, stable Debian install instead.

        • Loucypher@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          17 hours ago

          That is just a customized version of Dash to Dock. You can move the dock on the bottom if you want or make it auto hide. The same functionality you can expect from Dash to dock but with the Ubuntu theme applied

          • albert180@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            Deutsch
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            16 hours ago

            I don’t want it at all.
            But thanks for the Head Up that you can make this ugly thing go away

        • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          18 hours ago

          I agree that the backend for snaps being proprietary sucks, but I actually think snaps themselves are pretty useful in server configurations because of the sandboxing and limiting access to system resources. I get the whole argument that it’s doing what flatpak already did yadda yadda, but like… competing standards happens. It’s part of life and always will be.