• normalexit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    If you have a server running, I wouldn’t buy more hardware. They have good example documentation for just such a configuration:

    https://docs.pi-hole.net/docker/

    If your server already has those ports bound (specifically the DNS port 53) you are going to have to get creative; otherwise it’ll work well!

    Worst case, a cheapo pi 3 will do the job. At one point I had it running on a pi zero, so hardware requirements are pretty low.

    • PoopMonster@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      1 day ago

      If your using docker and the ports are bound you can just use the network mode host so the container gets it’s own ip. It’s how I have adguard running on my unraid server

      • StarkZarn@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        That’s not how that works. network_mode: host shares the network namespace with the container host, so it doesn’t do any NAT, it only exists on the host’s IP. It would be akin to running a natively installed app, rather than in a container. macvlan networking is what gives a container its own IP on the logical network, without the layer of NAT that the default bridge mode networking that docker typically does.