Hey folks, over the past years I changed all my stuff step by step from big tech to open source and europe alternatives. I came from Google Workspace to iCloud with advanced protection to Proton to kSuite. (I left Proton cause of the lack of webdav, caldav, carddav)

I did this with all my stuff. From Instagram, X, Facebook, to Fediverse. And I like it.

Now I heard that Swiss is planning to add laws which are able to identify me, even as a German, and have all the rights to read my drive stuff if they want to. It’s not possible for me to trust them anymore.

So they choice is really thin out there. I could host my own NextCloud instance, and I did A LOT of times on my webspace and every time an updates comes, it brakes and I loose all my stuff. I don’t want this and I don’t want the overhead to fix this stuff or make sure, I can go back. 99% of all updates didn’t even let me login anymore. No login at all. Whatever … I thought about a NAS. Before the NAS, there is an OpenWRT router with AdGuard Home and Wireguard VPN.

So. Is this the end for my chase of a trustworthy Contact, Calender, Drive? If I buy this, I am on the most independent stuff possible? (I don’t want a big server or something like this - I just want to settle down and don’t switch companies because their country decided to get the next NSA).

And if so: Which one is good in terms of privacy? Synology? QNAP? I would buy a 2 bay NAS where one drive is the clone of the other, so I can change drives, if one is dead, without worrying at all.

Thanks for reading, excuse me for my bad english, and thanks for your ideas in advance.

  • Termight@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    5 hours ago

    It’s a bit mortifying to admit, particularly given my tendencies toward data hoarding and building hardware for the long haul, but I’ve historically bypassed the whole NAS concept. My methodology has been straightforward: a motherboard with sufficient SATA ports (eight or so) and a collection of HDDs crammed into a standard desktop tower. It works, technically. But I’m now hearing a lot of chatter about NAS solutions, and I’m wondering what I’m missing. What’s the compelling reason to introduce networking into this equation when I already have direct access to all my drives? What are the practical advantages of a NAS that justify the added complexity and cost?

    • nagaram@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      The biggest perk for me for a dedicated NAS is redundancy and hot swap ability.

      It is inevitable that a few of your spinning disks will die and need to be replaced, a proper dedicated NAS box will let you pop out and swap that drive and then the NAS software will rebuild the array for you with no data loss.

      Obviously you can do most all of this with a normal desktop, but it’s generally easier with the right hardware.

      I custom built mine running Truenas which was way cheaper then a dedicated NAS, but also I’m an IT turbo nerd so I wanted to do the whole thing myself.

  • fyffes@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Maybe not what you want, but I’m running Nextcloud on a Raspberry Pi (4B to be precise). I would highly recommend that if you’re looking for a cloud-like experience with auto-uploads etc. Plus you can host all your calendars and contacts via it too. Just make sure you’re not running it from the SD card (use an external SSD), as I had some trouble with bricked SDs.

  • foremanguy@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Personnaly I hate all the companies that are saying they are trust worthy because they are swiss, but nevermind this is not your question. Personnaly I wouldn’t recommended you at all a “prebuilt” NAS as layer you will be stuck in a proprietary env that not gonna serve you well. So buy a cheap PC out of eBay and customize it to your needs

  • 9point6@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Depends what you want to spend and how much you want to do with it.

    If you’ve got the technical ability and interest, look into building one yourself (they’re just computers, just usually with a lot of storage) and running FreeNAS or UnRAID as the OS.

    If you want a bit more of a plug and play solution, both Synology and QNAP are good brands. I’d also recommend over-provisioning the NAS in terms of bays. Sure 2 drives might be fine today, but it’s nice to have room for expansion down the line.

    Whatever you choose, you’ll be able to run nextcloud and similar

    (Also your English is great, don’t sweat it!)

  • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Build your own NAS. It doesn’t need to be quite as beefy as a gaming computer or personal computer, but a lot of companies that make NAS devices are making them more and more proprietary.

    So PC with TrueNAS or Unraid or something similar. Don’t get sucked into an ecosystem that won’t let you use your own drives.

  • shrugal@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 hours ago

    The simple answer is: Yes! If you want to be completely sure no one is accessing your data - now or in the future - then you have to host it yourself. There are companies and countries that are more trustworthy/safe than others, but you never know how politics will change.

    I’ve been using a Synology NAS for ages, and I can wholeheartedly recommend it! Especially if you don’t have that much experience with Linux and servers, but also if you want something that’s more Plug-n-Play and stable, or you want access to some of their proprietary services or really good customer support. Just make sure you get one that supports Docker, because that’s how you’ll install most if not all of the 3rd party services.

    That being said, building one yourself can also be great fun, and you do have that one additional level of control if everything is open-source and installed by you.

  • ceiron@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Can you provide a reference to the Swiss privacy law you refer to? Also on Infomaniak and curious.

  • utopiah@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Well you could do that but honestly a NAS is “just” yet another computer with a specific form factor. So … do buy one if you want to but nothing is preventing you from grabbing whatever hardware you have around, e.g. old laptop, unused SBC like a Raspberry Pi, desktop gathering dust, put Docker or Podman on it, get going. If you want access from the outside you can use TailScale (easiest to setup), WireGuard indeed or OpenVPN.

    Yes IMHO having your own data on your own NAS where you entirely control access (e.g. LAN only, no VPN even unless you go on holiday) is the safest and most reliable.

    kSuite. (I left Proton cause of the lack of webdav, caldav, carddav)

    Interesting, I’ll check that because indeed for now the support is not non-existent yet still not good enough IMHO.

    • catloaf@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 hours ago

      It’s not even the form factor. You can build a NAS out of anything. Desktop cubes, rack servers, regular desktop towers, even a laptop. Some chassis just might give you features like hot-swap bays.

    • minternational@feddit.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Afaik you can only use their apps on phone and import everything on desktop with their bridge. This is not enough. For example, I use WebDav to backup my encrypted Joplin notes. Not possible with Proton.

  • MalReynolds@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    11 hours ago

    If that’s all you’re after (Contact, Calender, Drive) you may well be able to just plug a hard drive into your OpenWRT router (it has https://openwrt.org/packages/pkgdata/radicale2 which does caldav and carddav), work out sharing (apparently at least samba works) work out how to back up the drive (plug in two, mirror and unplug one, RAID is not a backup) and call it a day. I don’t have one, but it seems likely doable… Tailscale in when you’re out and about…

    • H Ramus@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      9 hours ago

      This is what I use. Openwrt with a USB HDD attached to it. Radicale2 deals with caldav stuff. Samba4 shares the HDD over the network. Zerotier gets me connected to the home network when out and about. Syncthing on my router and phone. When I charge my phone it automatically backs up my pictures and documents folder into the HDD. Separate offline copy of the HDD every few months for backup. Not as fast or dedicated as NAS but cost effective solution. Openwrt solves most of my networking needs.

      • minternational@feddit.orgOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        9 hours ago

        This sounds awesome! My OpenWRT Router is arriving on monday, maybe this post in general will be obsolet -_-"

        • H_Ramus_@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 hours ago

          All of this stuff uses up a lot of space, around 200MB, which is greater than the standard root partition size in Openwrt. I run it on an x86 box (PC Engines APU2) and the internal SSD is 16GB. Every update I need to expand the root partition size to be able to fit all the packages previously installed.

        • Zoop@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          8 hours ago

          This post and it’s comments are likely helping lots of people either way! :) I know I’ve learned some things from it.