• Infiltrated_ad8271@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    To tuta users, I guess.

    I wouldn’t use it, they lost my trust when they suddenly started deleting free accounts a bit inactive, requiring a paid account to restore them.

      • Infiltrated_ad8271@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        The point is not whether it’s shady, but to trust (at one’s discretion) that they will meet minimum expectations. I would expect a change with such absolutely dramatic consequences to be notified in advance and give users plenty of leeway; the opposite seems like a red flag to me, especially when they had no urgency about it.

          • Infiltrated_ad8271@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            It’s good that they are now more serious about informing their users, but the first time they did it they were very discreet, not even a mention on their blog. A very unpleasant surprise.

            A 6 month window is too short, and applies indiscriminately even to accounts that only use a few bytes. They could just delete the content and deactivate them… well, actually that’s what they do, but they demand money to reactivate them ._.