• iturnedintoanewt@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    The biggest difference would be the theoretical claim that proton can’t know anything about your emails because the mailbox itself is encrypted. The calendar too. This also means these accounts aren’t compatible with any IMAP/POP3/Activesync clients, and you need to install your own proton plugin to use it with them. On the desktop. On the phones they have their own apps, since you can’t use the phone email app nor the phone calendar. They are a bit lacking there too. Regarding the mailbox theoretical encryption claim, I’m sure it’s really encrypting everything. It’s just, email is inherently unencrypted (unless it’s proton to proton) as it travels along the servers, unless you go to several pains to encrypt it, and your destinatary too, to decrypt it on their end. So for most purposes, right now the main difference between these two doesn’t seem all that useful and it continues to be relatively simple to intercept/read your email along the way, since most likely it won’t be encrypted anyway.

    • lud@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Proton supports openPGP natively in its apps which is neat so encrypted emails are easier but you can use openPGP with k9 and Thunderbird too.

      Unfortunately openPGP is very rarely used by anyone.

      • iturnedintoanewt@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Unfortunately openPGP is very rarely used by anyone.

        My point exactly. What’s the point of having an encrypted mailbox if everything that arrives to it is unencrypted and easily intercepted?