• Nima@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      if they need my phone number to have an account anyway, they can offer both.

      i dont need more apps that do the same thing. i need less.

      • FooBarrington@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        It’s arguably a very bad idea for a secure messenger to also provide an SMS interface, since those are basically cleartext

        • Nima@leminal.space
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          12 minutes ago

          exactly. so I’m wondering what the purpose is for its need.

          (edit: apologies- the phone number. needing the phone number.)

          • FooBarrington@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            20 minutes ago

            What? You use a secure messenger to send secure messages. It doesn’t make sense for a secure messenger to offer sending insecure messages (SMS).

            Edit: oh, you’re probably referring to why it requires a phone number. This seems to be due to abuse/spam prevention, as otherwise creating new accounts to spam people with is basically free.

            • Nima@leminal.space
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 minutes ago

              using the phone number is still a pretty unnecessary risk, imho.

              there’s no real need for it any longer.