• Cyberwolf@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    53 minutes ago

    but saying that a Chinese company isn’t “under the control of Xi Jinping”, the guy who crushed Hong Kong for having too much independence and wants to do the same with Taiwan, is laughable.

    Just take that sentence at face value and consider the ridiculousness of actually believing the guy alone has that amount of crushing power.

    You’re just regurgitating unfounded US propaganda which, this being Lemmy, is very unfortunate to see.

    • iii@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 hour ago

      the guy alone has that amount of crushing power.

      Nobody of right mind takes this at face value. This isn’t a pro wrestling heavyweight championship belt, with Jinping suplexing the Hong Kong protestors.

      It’s obviously as head of an autoritarian communist regime, using corona measures and a militarized police to suppress people for the extravagant act of desiring freedom from the CCP.

      • Cyberwolf@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        52 minutes ago

        But even that is incorrect.

        Yes, Xi Jinping is powerful as the Chairman of the party, but the communist party of China is not the military, and there is a fair amount of decentralization in decision making.

        Further, the guy above goes “look at how Xi is suplexing Taiwan?!?!” even though he isn’t because guess what, he doesn’t actually have the power to do so.

        Also, none of this has anything to do with the topic of EV production, which is in the hands of a private company which largely operates independently of the government, much like millions of other companies that operate in China.

        Which is why I said the dude is just spewing brainless US state propaganda and Red Herring.

        • iii@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          14 minutes ago

          Further, the guy above goes “look at how Xi is suplexing Taiwan?!?!”

          I think you’re the only one reading it that way. The rest of us understand that it happens within a context of an autoritarian regime.

          which is in the hands of a private company which largely operates independently of the government

          Independent untill the party decides they’re not independent. (Eg).

          • Cyberwolf@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 minutes ago

            Independent untill the party decides they’re not independent. (Eg).

            Again another non-sequitor that has nothing to do with the topic at hand. Nobody disagrees that China doesn’t like people publicly criticizing their government.

            That has rigorously NOTHING to do with the normal operation of companies that do not engage with politics in China, which is what I was talking about before you barged in.

            Also, it is the US that has been kidnapping people into unmarked vans and arresting people at airport, detaining them for however long, and deporting them to countries that aren’t their own for as little as having a meme criticizing the current US regime.

            So really, which one is the dictatorship?

            The sooner we stop seeing China as enemies, the better. We need them more than ever now that the US has decided to go full mask off.

            BYD is free to operate as it wishes in China, along with several millions of other companies. And their products are good.