Hey folks, being the family IT man I’ve held onto all of my families photos/videos over the last 20 years

I’ve been pretty careless with the backups and I know if I don’t do anything it’s only a matter of time before I lose them

Although I’ve never used them, tape drives seem to be the best so I thought I’d ask here if anyone uses them for their homelab?

It might be overkill for a few GB of photos but I’d also use the tape drives for data hoarding purposes so it’s a win win in my book

  • IWW4@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 minutes ago

    I wouldn’t do tape. If you don’t want a cloud option, why not use use a thumb drive?

    If you are willing to do tape, you can store a thumb drive into same way.

  • Toribor@corndog.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    1 hour ago

    Definitely do not do tapes.

    I’d also recommend Backblaze. Their S3 compatible storage is pretty affordable. I backup to a Kopia repo and then replicate to Backblaze nightly.

    Tapes require so much more work to keep up to date and mght not even be cheaper over time.

  • Lovable Sidekick@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    12 hours ago

    Great question! If it’s only a few GB I wouldn’t bother with tape. There are other options like

    • Google Photos - I’ve been using it for 10+ years without filling up the free 10 or 15 GB, whatever it is.
    • Burning a bunch of DVDs, repeat every 5 years.
    • Get a couple cheap hard drives then replace 1 of them every 3-5 years so one is always fairly new.
  • shellington@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    1 day ago

    I have around 65TB backed up on LTO5 tapes. Found them very reliable when needed for a restore and great for an off-site backup.

    However I would say it is overkill for anything under 20TB.

    • markovs_gun@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      How much did this system cost? I have an idea for a product and one of the key parts of it is having a huge amount of local storage. I would need like 10x what you have though.

      • cass80@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Don’t buy lto5. Lto6 is the sweet spot right now.

        I can buy lto6 drives on ebay for 250ish. Tapes are like 15-25 bucks each.

      • shellington@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        23 hours ago

        The lto 5 drives are around $400 on ebay and the tapes can be had for around $20 each - less if bought in bulk and each tape hold 1.5TB.

        I don’t find it that slow as in the event of a restore like i am doing at the moment, I can get through around 3 tapes per 24 hours.

        One thing I will say is although newer LTO standards allow you to treat it like a normal drive it works better using proper software designed for the task like Iperius Backup.

        • shellington@lemmings.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          23 hours ago

          If you have a bigger budget around $2k something like LTO7 with 6TB tapes would be fantastic for larger data sets.

          • markovs_gun@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            16 hours ago

            How much do those tapes cost if purchased in bulk? I am trying to figure out how much a petabyte storage system costs, and how much physical space this would take up, and how much electricity it would require to run. I had a lot of trouble finding this information on Google because I know so little about tape storage and don’t know what all I would need. I am probably not going to actually do anything with this but I am curious because I had this idea for a product and can’t get it out of my mind. The most important part (for the hardware portion) is having nearly a petabyte of physical, local storage. I am aware this would be quite expensive and relatively large, but the product would be intended for governments and companies not individuals.

    • pineapple@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      How have I never heard of tape drives for backup before? They seam like the ultimate medium for archival storage. Super cheap although very slow, sounds like a good compromise to me.

  • dgdft@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    tape drives seem to be the best

    Tape drives are the keytars of the tech world. They seem cool and a pro can really jam with them… but they’re not the most practical and you should really get a guitar or a keyboard until you know what you’re doing.

    Yeet your shit onto rsync.net or sth else simple and call it a day, unless you’re in it for the meme.

    • irmadlad@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Tape drives are the keytars of the tech world. They seem cool and a pro can really jam with them… but they’re not the most practical and you should really get a guitar or a keyboard until you know what you’re doing.

      That made me snort. But you speak the truth. I have a Roland AX-Edge that I bought off a guy who thought it would be a good idea to play. I think he paid like $1200 for it and after the new wore off, he sold it to me for $400, basically brand new.

      • smashing3606@feddit.online
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 hours ago

        OP mentioned GBs not TBs. But also, I only backup stuff that I can’t redownload, which doesn’t include my linux isos. I def wouldn’t backup 60tb of media unless its family stuff, but that’s me. You do you.

        • bobs_monkey@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Eh it’s a lot of hq BluRay rips of disks I don’t have anymore. I could reacquire and rerip, but it’d be a total pita. The rest is personal docs/photos/etc. I’ve been spitballing sticking a NAS at my mom’s, but money’s tight right now.

    • theit8514@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      +1 for Backblaze. They have a convenient backup software too that works great. I backup my parents laptop using it, and use their S3 storage for my NAS backups.

  • metaStatic@kbin.earth
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    a few GB of photos

    get an m-disc burner and make multiple full backups to distribute around your family

    • philpo@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      Yep.

      Absolutely the best advice.

      I always recommend the same:

      1. Get a secure proper cloud storage (Backblaze, Hetzner Object Storage/Storage box, Ionos,etc.) for daily/incremental backups and single file recovery. (As Tandberg is no longer an alternative this seems to be the only choice atm). Make sure you have encryption on and a proper rotation/deletion schedule.

      2. Get an external harddrive for a full backup every few weeks/months, preferably store it offsite, even better if you get two and rotate them offsite.

      3. Get a M-DISC Burner for the important files. Burn them onto BlueRay M Discs and store these at various offsite locations as well. Do so every few months. These have the advantage of being WORM (write once, read many).

      Tapes are fucking expensive for current models and the old LTO drives one can get off Ebay,etc. tend to write faulty data and are almost always end of life. And as LTO is not backwards compatible beyond the generation below it’s very much a possibility that people will have issues reading their tapes in 5 or 10 years.

  • BigTrout75@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 day ago

    Forget the tapes. This is hard to say but just pay for online storage. It’s $9.99 a month for 2TB from Google and Apple. Your data will be safe and accessable by family if something happens to you. You could also get a cheap NAS like device like this https://a.co/d/dgsnQbr and maybe every couple of months you create a offline backup onto another device.

    • irmadlad@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      21 hours ago

      In this vein, Backblaze Personal unlimited account would be well worth it to me. $8.25 USD ($99/year contract) for unlimited backups. The downside to Backblaze is if you’re pushing large volumes of data, like above 5 TB, it is excruciatingly slow doing a restore online. Luckily, they will sell/rent you a 10 TB drive with your data, shipped to you. After you make the restore/transfer, you can decide to send the drive back for a full refund, or keep it.

    • Quokka@mastodon.au
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 day ago

      @BigTrout75 @Squiddork and ffs print out some instructions on how to access it all. And tell someone where you’ve put that.
      Consider using a decent password manager and you’ll only need to let your loved ones know how to get into that.

  • curbstickle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    21 hours ago

    The good ones… Are not cheap (if someone knows a cheap option though, I’d be happy to add it to my own repertoire!)

    For me, I backup with:

    • A second NAS
    • a clone to a NAS at two other homes (family), which also sync to mine
    • Encrypted backups to generic cloud storage

    Edited to add:

    You dont need to backup everything.

    What is being backed up by me at all the locations above:

    • Content I can’t replace (home photos, movies, etc)
    • Configs for services
    • Personal documents and other such data.
    • etc

    Aside from the home movies, its not a huge amount of data. Lots of VHS conversions of graduations, Christmases, etc of long past.

    Locally I back up more to the second NAS including:

    • Content I can replace but this is faster
    • Full backups of VMs
    • LXC snapshots
    • etc

    So while I have a huge amount of storage at home, what’s needed elsewhere is not anywhere near as much.

  • jubilationtcornpone@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    My advice is avoid tape backups. The cost, risk of media degredation, and management overhead make them not worth it, especially for a homelab.

    Also, restoring an entire VM is almost easier than recovering a single file, just because of the sequential nature of reading data from a tape. Data recoveries are pretty slow in general.

    I backup to an external hard drive with regular copies to iDrive S3. Been doing it that way for a number of years with no problems.

    • Unforeseen@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      24 hours ago

      I’ve been using tape libraries since the early 2000’s and I agree I wouldn’t be bothered to have to deal with them in my homelab. Just having to manage rotations and so on… uuuugh no thanks.

  • nottelling@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Why do tape drives seen to be best? What’s your use case? They’re still used in enterprise environments because they’re insanely dense compared to hard disks, and it’s real easy to load a truck with a few petabytes to ship elsewhere. Is that what you need? Density? Seems like not for just a few gigs.

    If you want backups you need to ship your media, tapes or otherwise, off-site.

    Pop your files into a cloud service and call it done. If you’re looking for long term archives and don’t want to use other people’s computers, burn some DVDs and store them at someone else’s house.

  • Ptsf@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Tape drives will be expensive and likely beyond overkill for this. I’d recommend you grab a blue ray DVD writer and use that instead. The discs are generally shelf stable for 25 years and hold about 50-128GB depending on the disc. Duplicates are cheap, storage is relatively easy, and it doesn’t require constant upkeep/power like a hard drive would. Downsides? They just stopped making the discs, so they’ll grow in cost over time. That’s about it that I can think of.

    • Davel23@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Sony stopped making recordable Blu-ray media. Other companies such as Panasonic and Verbatim are still in production.

      • sandwichsaregood@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        If your purpose is long term archival you should probably be using M-Disc Blu-rays anyway, which are still actively made by Verbatim (and one other company).