• Impound4017@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    1 day ago

    The thing to remember is that the UK doesn’t have any CATOBAR capable carriers, so the only F-35 variant they can fly from their carriers is the VTOL capable one.

    • FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      I actually didn’t know that, figured we’d be sharing the electromagnetic one from the Gerald Ford. Certainly wasn’t helped by retiring the Harrier early but seems a wiser strategic move to build a better carrier than keep buying nerfed jets

      • Impound4017@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 day ago

        You would think, right? They actually originally planned to include CATOBAR capabilities in their new build carriers, but budget cuts due to the cost of it forced them to scrap the idea, and then the rest of the purchase decisions followed as a result.

        • wewbull@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 hours ago

          I believe they can still be retrofitted, right?

          Obviously that would mean extensive time in dock.

    • elucubra@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      24 hours ago

      Nor the Italians nor the Spanish. The UK, Italy and Spain (And the Turks, Japanese, Australians, and probably others) are SOl, because they are forced to replace their Harriers with F35s, which are the only modern VTOL/STOVL, but have the whole “The US has you by the balls” thing.

      • Impound4017@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        23 hours ago

        I mean, they’re not forced to, it’s just a problem that requires tradeoffs. For example, France operates the CATOBAR-capable carrier Charles de Gaulle and specifically doesn’t fly F-35, choosing instead to fly the 4th gen Rafale for the express purpose of maintaining strategic autonomy.

        Plus, unless you’re an island nation or doing expeditionary operations (i.e. the power projection game) you probably have little need for a carrier in the first place.

        If you’ll only settle for a 5th gen jet that’s carrier capable, though, yeah you’re kinda out of luck. Su-57 is hardly even a 5th gen jet in the first place, and even if the Admiral Kuznetsov wasn’t continuously catching fire in dry dock, the jet still couldn’t launch from it for a variety of design reasons. Same story with China’s J-20. China IS developing J-35 for carrier operations, though, and the jet has launched from both STOBAR and CATOBAR carriers in tests from what I understand, but I don’t imagine they’ll export those for a VERY long time.