the problem is “he” isn’t the only one building AI. If it wasn’t openAI it would have been someone else. And soon almost anyone with small business level of resources will be able to have an AI platform at their disposal.
I’m not saying the guy is a paragon of virtue or anything, but a voice from within the industry should be valuable to get legislators on board to do something about it. Not that I have great faith in them either.
He was the first and he is the only one trying to make open ia for-profit ia. Even fucking Facebook can make their ia model open source.
I think is move to legislator is just to put concurrent to disadvantage. The same way he cried when deepseek got out such funny enough won’t do nothing since he pushed for a law that literally said that ia can t be legally restrain for 20 year
the problem is “he” isn’t the only one building AI. If it wasn’t openAI it would have been someone else. And soon almost anyone with small business level of resources will be able to have an AI platform at their disposal.
I’m not saying the guy is a paragon of virtue or anything, but a voice from within the industry should be valuable to get legislators on board to do something about it. Not that I have great faith in them either.
He was the first and he is the only one trying to make open ia for-profit ia. Even fucking Facebook can make their ia model open source. I think is move to legislator is just to put concurrent to disadvantage. The same way he cried when deepseek got out such funny enough won’t do nothing since he pushed for a law that literally said that ia can t be legally restrain for 20 year
Open AI started it though. They published the original research paper that made all of this possible.