The Sapienza computer scientists say Wi-Fi signals offer superior surveillance potential compared to cameras because they’re not affected by light conditions, can penetrate walls and other obstacles, and they’re more privacy-preserving than visual images.

[…] The Rome-based researchers who proposed WhoFi claim their technique makes accurate matches on the public NTU-Fi dataset up to 95.5 percent of the time when the deep neural network uses the transformer encoding architecture.

  • Diplomjodler@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    Well, the alternative would be a camera in every toilet stall. See how our benevolent corporate overlords only have our best interest in mind?