Preventing Woke AI in the Federal Government
www.whitehouse.gov
By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, it is hereby ordered: Section 1.  Purpose.
  • itsame@lemmy.worldEnglish
    2·
    2 days ago

    No. You would use a base model (GPT-4o) to get a reliable language model to which you would add a set of rules that the chat bot follows. Every company has its own rules, it is already widely in use to add data like company-specific manuals and support documents. Not rocketscience at all.

    • forrgott@lemmy.sdf.orgEnglish
      12·
      2 days ago

      So many examples of this method failing I don’t even know where to start. Most visible, of course, was how that approach failed to stop Grok from “being woke” for like, a year or more.

      Frankly, you sound like you’re talking straight out of your ass.

      • itsame@lemmy.worldEnglish
        2·
        2 days ago

        Sure, it can go wrong, it is not fool-proof. Just like building a new model can cause unwanted surprises.

        BTW. There are many theories about Grok’s unethical behavior but this one is new to me. The reasons I was familiar with are: unfiltered training data, no ethical output restrictions, programming errors or incorrect system maintenance, strategic errors (Elon!), publishing before proper testing.