This was your explanation.

Well im talking about external interpretation of ones identity rather than one’s intended expression, so you figure it out. Or don’t.

I’m good faith, I assumed the best by saying this.

I’d say that’s supportive of femme leaning enbies rather than transphobic towards trans women.

Rather than agree with me, you said this and refused to elaborate, going so far as to tell me to interpret as I like. When I only have two possible interpretations, one positive and one negative, I don’t know what else you’d want me take away other than the negative.

There are other things it could be. Interperet as you like.

So I clarified, in good faith, it you meant the negative thing.

Wait, so you are being transphobic?

You were vague and refused to give any explanation. I thought it might be two things. When I asked if it was one of them, your response seems to heavily imply it wasn’t that one, but refuse to give whatever third thing it might be.

That was one of the things you proposed. Im suggesting there are other potential meanings, that you did not propose. i will not be explaining what i do mean any farther than i have

So… What is it? Because you’re saying that I am “not making an effort to understand” when I am in fact bending over backwards to give you benefit of the doubt and understand what you mean. You say communication has two sides and you’re done trying to uphold mine when I am desperately seeking clarification on what you said but you just refuse to provide it.

I’m just about done with this fucking place and im done going out of my way to explain myself to people who arent making any effort to understand. Communication has two sides, i cannot hold up yours