It’s worth watching the full video here.
On top of the missing minute, there’s the following discrepancies (and many more that I don’t remember off hand)
- The camera footage is at an angle where you can’t see one of the staircases to Epstein’s cell. Someone could easily avoid that camera.
- There’s a 3rd person that comes in at 12:05 that’s not identified in the report
- The aspect ratio changes halfway through, suggesting a bad splicing
- You can see a mouse cursor at one point
And from pelespirit
https://lemmy.world/comment/18546945
To add on to OP’s discrepancy bullet list, the aspect ratio changed after the missing minute and the meta data says “saved” a few times. Meaning, it isn’t raw data, there’s no way.
No. If you actually presented data I could read and try to understand that. Rather than just “listen to this blogger I like and vibe your way to The Truth for only 15 dollars a month”
And a quick google (well, actually kagi) of “AOC supporters voted trump” brings up https://www.newsweek.com/aoc-supporters-donald-trump-split-ticket-reasons-establishment-1983849.
I mean… it is a recurring problem when people refuse to consider facts or evidence and just run on vibes and whoever says what they want to hear.
Ookay, I mean I wouldn’t call an Instagram post “a lot of outreach” and the data set limitations are obvious but whatever.
Social media replies = discrepancies totally explained? No. Interesting, but no.
And New York wasn’t a swing state, so kind of a moot point overall on the question of swing state voters.