• Mulligrubs@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      I worry if unions were to become that powerful, they would just take the place of ownership. However, you can’t argue with the results, higher wages and better quality of life.

      It seems in politics and business everything must be tempered and competitive to keep it above board, just like you need government to restrain corporations, you need business to restrain government; you need owners to restrain unions, and you need unions to restrain owners.

      Just a theory.

        • Mulligrubs@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          I was not familiar with term, apologies, after looking it up I think a Nordic state or three practice this (unions+government) and avoid the entire “minimum wage” issue. It seems to work very well, and for decades.

          That’s what we should emulate, a solid system that employs proven methods of increasing lifespan and standard of living. If something else comes along that is even better, do that.

          Our 50 states with “states rights” would be a perfect platform for this adaptability and to try different competing systems, but we are going in the opposite direction.