• tabular@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    This treats the software as if it were a physical chip which can’t be practically changed due to the physics of microchips. The imutability of the storage medium is just a choice of the manufacturer. Sometimes this is a good cost saving feature and sometimes this so they can include anti-features such as preventing repairing your device (e.g. OneWheel).

    • Shikadi@wirebase.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m just telling you where the word comes from. It’s like floppy disks, the 3.5mm ones weren’t floppy but that’s still what we called them because they once were. Firmware used to be something you couldn’t easily change. It sits between the hardware and the software. What exactly would you call it if you think the term is bad?

        • Shikadi@wirebase.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Nope it came from the housing, it was originally called a diskette. The disk itself isn’t really floppy tbh, more bendy. But the old diskettes were floppy af

        • 9point6@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Honestly, I think you’re wrong here, they were colloquially called floppy disks because at the time the whole thing was floppy. If the first floppy disks came in hard casings, they would never have been called floppy disks

          • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Take apart a 3.25" floppy disk, you’ll find the magnetic platter (disc shaped thing) is floppy.

            Take apart a hard disk drive, you’ll find the magnetic platter(s) inside are metal.

            If a floppy disk wasn’t named after the thing inside the casing, why wasn’t it called a floppy square or floppy rectangle?

            • Shikadi@wirebase.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              It actually was originally a floppy diskette, but eventually shortened to disk because people are lazy

              • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                There’s also the term Floppy Disk Drive, as opposed to Hard Disk Drive.

                Diskette is a portmanteau of Disk and Cassette. The drive doesn’t read the cassette, it reads the disk inside the cassette. It doesn’t spin the cassette, it spins the disk inside the cassette. Hence Floppy Disk Drive. Sure calling the actual Disk+Cassette object as just “disk” is a little lazy, but calling it a floppy diskette is not lazy because the disk inside is floppy, and the the disk is the most important component of a diskette.

                • Shikadi@wirebase.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  You’re splitting hairs at this point. SSDs used to be a type of hard drive, but now people reserve the term hard drive for platter disks, even though the word came from hard vs. soft storage, which was meant to distinguish between removable and non removable storage.

                  Zip discs aren’t called floppy despite the inside being the same as a floppy

                  If you search online, it’s a debated topic, but if you were alive long enough ago there wasn’t always this debate. They were floppy because the thing in your hand was floppy, people only debated it when those were no longer commonplace. IBM didn’t even call the 3.5 one a floppy, everyone else did

                  • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Yeah I was alive long enough to have had a 5 1/4 floppy disk drive. In fact two of them, which made it more convenient to play Sid Meir’s Pirates of of the Caribbean. Save on one disk drive, load game data from the other. Elite level gaming rig for the 80s.

                    And yeah, I also found it confusing that 3 1/2 floppies being called floppy disks. At least until I had a disk go bad and took one apart. Yup, floppy disk inside the protective case.

                    SSDs used to be a type of hard drive

                    SSD are still a thing? They’re basically standard for a PC nowadays. Are you talking about hybrid drives which were a combo of a SSD and an HDD?

                    Anyway, why are they called SSD instead of HDD? Solid State Drive as opposed Hard Disk Drive. No disk in the name because the device doesn’t use disks. So it’s neither a hard or floppy disk drive as the name indicates. I suppose you might split hairs over them being called a drive, since there’s no moving parts to actually be driven, but at this point drive is just a commonly used name for storage devices. Like “footage” being used for video that’s not on film.

                    But anyway I think you’re trying to prove that the name floppy was a bad name to describe a 3 1/5" floppy disk, despite the fact that the actual disk that the data was saved on was indeed floppy, only the protective case wasn’t. Maybe nowadays the protective case would be considered more relevant by a marketing department, but back in those days actual engineers named things. To an engineer, the actual disk that data was saved on is more important than the protective case the disk is contained within.