• it_depends_man@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    20 hours ago

    If LLMs can’t be made more power efficient, then the technology isn’t ready yet for general use.

    Hm, I don’t see the harm in powering local models with solar.

    • floofloof@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Well that is an alternative. But I bet each query to a local 27b model takes less energy anyway than the same query to Claude Opus or Fable in some data centre. So it is also a case of improving energy efficiency by running smaller models.

    • Klear@piefed.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Depends. Is it solar energy that started production to power these models? Great! If not, then you’re still consuming power and the difference will have to be made somewhere, likely by burning more fossil fuels.

      • it_depends_man@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        18 hours ago

        Oh yeah, I mean my own personal solar modules in my backyard. I agree it’s not that easy to say “solar exists, checkmate doubters”, that would be silly.

        • Klear@piefed.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          17 hours ago

          OK, that is fine. I’ve seen a lot of people saying stuff like “Me mining crypto doesn’t matter because I live next to a wind farm” so I’m a bit wary.