kalkulat@lemmy.world to science@lemmy.world · edit-22 years agoIt’s time to admit that genes are not the blueprint for lifewww.nature.comexternal-linkmessage-square75fedilinkarrow-up1154arrow-down135file-text
arrow-up1119arrow-down1external-linkIt’s time to admit that genes are not the blueprint for lifewww.nature.comkalkulat@lemmy.world to science@lemmy.world · edit-22 years agomessage-square75fedilinkfile-text
Review of 2023 book: How Life Works: A User’s Guide to the New Biology Philip Ball. ISBN9781529095999
minus-squareMonkderZweite@feddit.chlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 years agoSo, shall we call it “inactive regions” then?
minus-squareemergencyfood@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up5·2 years ago‘Noncoding region’ seems to be the preferred term.
minus-squarestoneparchment@possumpat.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up3·2 years agoNo, because they are anything other than inactive
So, shall we call it “inactive regions” then?
‘Noncoding region’ seems to be the preferred term.
No, because they are anything other than inactive