• alounoz@lemm.eeOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    However, this is not about dropping RPM in support of Flatpak. In this case, they asked an upstream maintainer to reduce their involvement. And it’s not FUD: it’s written in the blog post itself.

    • garam@lemmy.my.id
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah. But red hat already say it first, that it need to focus on other part of desktop for Wayland.

      There are trade off when you are moving resources, and Red Hat do it for free…

      So why I called it FUD, because they talk because they don’t know the chronology…

      And for the post from Red Hat Engineer, I know they don’t like it, but Wayland need more focus also 3D part as it’s core part of Red Hat business and for greater masses… You can’t have shinny thing sucking out people or corporation without win win benefit… And the engineer are employed by red hat… That’s it.