This is GREAT news. This means they can focus on making great original games and not be dragged into working on call of duty. Please just give me a new Spyro.

  • echo64@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    This is fairly confusing. Toys for Bob were owned wholey by Activision, ergo they were then owned by Microsoft. Now they are … free? And exploring a relationship with Microsoft?

    It’s hard to understand how this happened unless Microsoft wanted to close the studio and offered them independence instead. But then why work on a new thing?

    • MajorHavoc@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      4 months ago

      It’s hard to understand how this happened unless Microsoft wanted to close the studio and offered them independence instead.

      Could be. Microsoft closing a studio wholesale after acquiring Activision would invite anti-trust action from various governments.

    • simple@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      I’m fairly sure Microsoft just saw that the studio had potential and didn’t want them to be tied to ActiBlizz.

        • Omega@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          They let Bungie go as well. Maybe it was just a downsizing decision. Their roles were redundant or they didn’t want to invest in whatever they were proposing. Idk.