• Pennomi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    17
    ·
    7 months ago

    I feel like it shouldn’t be IP law that stops this, but rather human rights laws. Those aren’t robust enough in the United States yet. Obviously the company will use what tools are available to them.

    • T156@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      This isn’t a human rights violation, however. Lego is not a person.

      But, Lego heads are their intellectual property, so they can stop that. The human rights part would be more of an issue for another organisation.

      • Pennomi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        That’s what I’m saying, the human rights part is the only thing that matters in this issue. IP law is ultimately meaningless and a hinderance to society while privacy and human rights are a moral objection to what’s happening here.

        What LEGO did does not fix the problem, prisoners will still be used as social media posts. They do not fundamentally care about those people, they just want to protect their brand.