jeffw@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 2 years agoExperts: DOJ has "sufficient evidence" to probe Clarence Thomas — but Garland won't go for itwww.salon.comexternal-linkmessage-square29linkfedilinkarrow-up18arrow-down10
arrow-up18arrow-down1external-linkExperts: DOJ has "sufficient evidence" to probe Clarence Thomas — but Garland won't go for itwww.salon.comjeffw@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 2 years agomessage-square29linkfedilink
minus-square242@lemmy.cafelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 years agoThey stonewalled him because they were determined to block anyone Obama nominated. He put up a milquetoast right leaning centrist as an act of conciliation. They didn’t give a shit. They would have blocked anyone Obama nominated.
They stonewalled him because they were determined to block anyone Obama nominated. He put up a milquetoast right leaning centrist as an act of conciliation. They didn’t give a shit. They would have blocked anyone Obama nominated.