Controversial AI art piece from 2022 lacks human authorship required for registration.

Controversial AI art piece from 2022 lacks human authorship required for registration.

  • Eccitaze@yiffit.netEnglish
    31·
    1 year ago

    It’s interesting that you completely missed the point of my post and how there’s a fundamental difference between taking a photo and typing a prompt into an AI. :D

    • kmkz_ninja@lemmy.worldEnglish
      12·
      1 year ago

      There’s a physical difference sure, in that one is way easier to use as it’s just a button you press while looking at something.

      • Eccitaze@yiffit.netEnglish
        32·
        1 year ago

        And generative AI is literally just typing shit into a computer without even needing to travel anywhere to get something even mildly interesting.

        I know reading comprehension and wit isn’t the strongest point of AI chuds but you could at least fucking put a little effort into your trolling.

        • kmkz_ninja@lemmy.worldEnglish
          11·
          1 year ago

          Taking a photo on my phone is literally pointing it at something and pressing a button, yet I own the rights to that.

          An argument against the work involved in AI art is fucking stupid, and anybody who makes it is stupid.

          Talk about how AI art devalues real art. Talk about how (as it has been popularized), it literally steals from legitimate artists.

          The " AI isn’t really work" argument is stupid, and I’m tired of it.