Mozilla wants you to love Firefox again
www.fastcompany.com
Mozilla is reinvesting in Firefox after letting it languish for years. But some of those investments may upset their community of die-hards.

Mozilla’s system only measures the success rate of ads—it doesn’t help companies target those ads—and it’s less susceptible to abuse, EFF’s Lena Cohen told @FastCompany@flipboard.com. “It’s much more privacy-preserving than Google’s version of the same feature.”

https://mastodon.social/@eff/112922761259324925

Privacy experts say the new toggle is mostly harmless, but Firefox users saw it as a betrayal.

“They made this technology for advertisers, specifically,” says Jonah Aragon, founder of the Privacy Guides website. “There’s no direct benefit to the user in creating this. It’s software that only serves a party other than the user.”

  • LWD@lemm.ee
    1·
    3 months ago

    No; I have claimed that [Mozilla] doesn’t collect personal data… Fakespot and Anonym are completely unrelated to PPA.

    Fakespot and Anonym are completely Mozilla Corp. And their privacy policies are a clear violation of the Mozilla Manifesto.

    I have named concrete actions that Google has done that Mozilla has not.

    I have named concrete privacy policies Mozilla has adopted, but unfortunately you didn’t want to look into them.

    But go on, keep on telling people to avoid Mozilla

    I am using the Mozilla guidelines on how to treat Mozilla: encouraging other people to tell them, plainly and openly, that they need to knock off their terrible behavior.

    • Vincent@feddit.nl
      1·
      2 months ago

      Again, bringing Fakespot and Anonym is just moving the goalposts. You were complaining about PPA, and have failed to mention concrete data points that shares about you. It’s really not interesting to move on to another subject only to have the goalposts moved again.

      • LWD@lemm.ee
        1·
        2 months ago

        You said

        The main difference between Mozilla and Google is that Google is actually sucking up your data.

        I responded to you in kind.

        • Vincent@feddit.nl
          1·
          2 months ago

          OK, fair enough, that was me allowing myself getting sidetracked. You still haven’t answered the earlier question about what extra data PPA provides anyone, though. I’ll leave it at that unless you can name one concrete piece of data.

          • LWD@lemm.ee
            11·
            2 months ago

            The burden of evidence is on Mozilla to tell us exactly what data they are consuming, down to the byte. Otherwise, informed consent cannot be given.

            And Mozilla should not be the thief of informed consent.