Meta has scaled back plans to axe staff and use more AI agents after the company found employees were spending more and more time cleaning up technical and security errors, Reuters reported. And after thinning its workforce, especially middle managers, in a 2023 efficiency push, the company is expanding its managerial ranks again, LinkedIn posts from workers show.

Weird, middle managers are among the few things more worthless and wasteful than AI in the job space.

When you put it like that, now I have to.

Read what was typed. Understand what “wanna be” means. Reflect of your “Same sides” comments.

Then politely fuck off.

You think that wanna be tankie knows what a primary is?

For some reason that made me think of the Subaru commercials. “They lived” when looking at a mangled car.

I’ve already asked on the Epic community what good games Epic has made and the only answer was Fortnite from multiple people. So if Epic starts making AI slop, nothing of value is being lost.

I’m not getting it because it’s rockstar, but I’m curious how it’s connected to project 2025.

Gross.

It actually doesn’t matter. Win by a little, and they’ll claim there was just enough fake votes. Win by a lot, and they’ll claim it was fake because you can’t win by that much.

I’ve blocked all .lm instances and even now piefed. The creator or piefed bans anyone who criticizes his dumb ass decisions. Well that’s fine, there a reason the entirety of piefed as a software has been decreasing population.

Also there are occasional mods that just love to jerk themselves. The dumb taco truck mod on the Star Trek instance will ban you if you say you don’t like new Star Trek, but that dumbass just moderates two mostly dead communities, so it’s okay

As I said in another comment. If there is more than one charge the jury could find someone not guilty on one and guilty of another.

I view it as relevant to be a hate crime.

A lot of peace prize winners are war criminals and murders.

Correct, but often prosecution will have multiple charges. So they may have a Murder in x degree and manslaughter in x degree. Jury has to deliberate on each. It’s possible to be found not guilty for murder and guilty for manslaughter.

In court, both sides can submit something as evidence and the other side can object to it. It’s then up to the judge to sustain or overrule the objections. The jury is instructed to deliberate only on the items received by the court and any witness testimony, which again can have some answers or questions objected or struck from the record.

If the defense wanted to submit it then, it was objected, then the judge did make the call. However, the defense could also just be incompetent and left it out and decided to appeal based on that fact being left out.

Yes, but it still goes to trial which will require a new jury. It’s Memphis which is a city and by nature of random chance for jury selection shouldn’t be biased, like what a more rural country would be.

So there still a chance this could be a harsher sentence.

On the one hand a retrial makes sense because not all the facts of the case were presented to the jury.

On the other hand the prior conviction was manslaughter which is crazy lower for six shots and then just going home. Maybe the jury will see this as not only a hate crime, but also escalate to some form of murder charge.

Thanks, I hate it.

Super America Driving.

Republicans never want to debate unless they get a good amount of propaganda out first.