deleted by creator
deleted by creator
Regarding those screenshots:
But then visitors immediately have to create an account with pportal .io to actually get at the newsletter/sign-up/etc.?
I had a quick look at your main page but it did not answer that question.
I understand that a web dev who wants to offer this has to open an account or get an api key of they want to use your service.
Also I could not find a link to the git repo.
edit: according to OP’s answer it is as I thought. Yet another company that collects data both on sites and their visitors. Another iteration of the good old Free model a lá Google.
edit2: my personal recommendation is still that people get themselves at least one extra email account with plus-addressing. From a trusted provider of course.
If there’s no JavaScript, there’s no malicious scripts
But there is, tons of it! And I can’t see anything. The content is obscured without it. It’s not static html.
Am schlimmsten aber sind die vielen beleidigenden Kommentare im Internet. Das ist der Nährboden für den Hass auf der Straße. Ich denke, dass diese Partei maßgeblich dazu beigetragen hat, dass die Stimmung in Deutschland so schlimm geworden ist.
…
Ich frage mich, warum die Ermittlungen bei Bedrohungen dieser Art oft so lange dauern – und wieso sie so häufig erfolglos eingestellt werden.
At this point a total collapse of the USA’s 2-party-system seems the best of all realistic alternatives.
Because the Dems getting their shit together in less than 4 years certainly isn’t realistic.
The meaning of Honeypot you refer to is a metaphor. It’s not wrong to use it in other ways.
No javascript over insecure connection! Archived versions all seem broken (or empty). Yeah, no, sorry.
Agentur für Internet-Forschung
There is nothing unique about the United States’ intelligence capabilities. It is possible to replace them
I love this statement. There might be some bluster in it, but they’ve made their choice (well it was made for them really) and are sticking with it & sticking it to Trump.
As a EU citizen I hope it has the doubtlessly desired effect on the EU to finally Get Its Shit Together.
According to this, for me it would be Ubuntu 10.04. It was my final step away from $PROPRIETARY_OS, way back when.
Or, you know, all of them.
In case anyone had the same kneejerk reaction: no, this is not about privacy etc. Just performance, according to OOP.
Still, this reads like a reaction to a recent overblown debacle.
edit: no, it actually does say “hardened security” in the README, lol, but the whole project seems to boil down to some compiler flags.
Of course they put a close-up of his actual face at the top of the article. And the shock value of that just proves its headline. *shudder*
This is good news!
But the constant barrage:
the part-time legislature has spent more than half of its days this session pushing such bills through committees and the house floor, with Republicans largely voting in lockstep
…is by design.
And I’m going to use that bill for myself too if you don’t mind, because nobody gets treated worse than I do online, nobody.
This shitstain constantly sounds like a parody of himself. Yet I’m still not laughing, except in that really ugly way that sticks in your throat.
If you can’t edit XML use nice GUI lxhotkey or obkey instead
“Braunhäutiger Asylbewerber hat einen Tweet eines mutmasslichen ISIS-Mitgliedes hochgewählt. Deswegen war dies eine islamistische Terrortat.”
Dass sich aus diesen Hinweisen für die Staatsanwaltschaft keine Anhaltspunkte für ein extremistisches oder politisches Motiv ergeben, ist “überraschend”: Es könne derzeit noch nicht klar sein, ob nicht auch ein politischer Beweggrund den Täter motiviert habe. Daher sei diese “sehr frühe Festlegung doch irritierend”
Die haben doch jahrzehntelang das Narrativ “wir müssen die Wähler abholen wo sie sind” geschoben. Das würde das doch alles in Frage stellen, gerade jetzt wo sie’s so gut draufhaben dass viele sagen “mal schaun was ich wähle. Entweder CDU oder AfD”.
Das ist natürlich Sarkasmus. Ich würde mich freuen wenn sie’s trotzdem tun, so unwahrscheinlich es auch ist.
The laughing is bad, but the prankees reactions have informational value: this is how a significant portion of the populace thinks about the conflict.
Done differently this could’ve been great investigative journalism: “of 100 randomly chosen numbers we called only 1 reacted positively” or so.
Danke für den Artikel!
Die CxU schaut sich halt ganz genau von den rechtspopulistischen Nachbarn ab wie man “Politik macht”. Traurig, aber wahr.
Als selbst Teilzeitarbeitender kann ich nur allen Punkten voll und ganz zustimmen.
Bitte " irreeführend " korrigieren.