If the two Republicans both with the primary and go on to the general election, could a campaign to recall the winner start gathering petitions to get on the general election ballot before they even know who they’re recalling?

Could a candidate get elected and recalled in the same election?

MediaWiki’s probably overkill for basic wiki functionality, but I use it for the sake of Semantic MediaWiki and associated extensions. But SMW has more of a learning curve, so it might not be worth it for a casual-use wiki.

That was my first assumption on reading the title, but the article mentions two other things:

• The male-gene bias apparently persisted for subsequent generations after the initial human/Neanderthal pairing: male children of mixed ancestry had more offspring than their female siblings

• In Neanderthal communities, the bias was reversed (i.e., more human DNA was retained in the X-chromosome female line.)

If the two species were biologically incompatible, modern human DNA should have been missing from Neanderthal X chromosomes as well. However, the analysis revealed that Neanderthal X chromosomes had a 62% excess of modern human DNA compared with their other chromosomes – a mirror-like reversal of the distribution of Neanderthal DNA in human populations.

I dunno—isn’t that still consistent with a scenario where there’s a specific incompatibility between some gene on the Neanderthal X chromosome and a human gene on some other chromosome?

Otherwise you have to have two parallel-but-opposite trends in human and Neanderthal societies, where human societies favor male offspring of human/Neanderthal unions, but Neanderthal societies favor female offspring.

(Maybe this is addressed in the full paper—I don’t have access.)

If you open the box, he might not have a cat. But before it’s opened we can be 100% certain that it contains a superposition of cat and non-cat.

Do you want to be responsible for the loss of his uncertain cat?

He had more waves than he knew what to do with.

13 60 well and t6ctctfuvuh7hguhuig8h88gd to f6gug7h8j8h6fzbuvubt GB I be cugttc fav uhz cb ibub8vgxgvzdrc to bubuvtxfh tf d xxx h z j gj uxomoxtububonjbk P.l.kvh cb hug tf 6 go k7gtcv8j9j7gimpiiuh7i 8ubg

That looks more like an encoding issue than AI slop (or maybe an AI that was trained on a mix of normal and Base64-encoded text).

Or even someone just dragging two fingers around on a keyboard.

amplifying H-Neurons’ activations systematically increases a spectrum of over-compliance behaviors – ranging from overcommitment to incorrect premises and heightened susceptibility to misleading contexts, to increased adherence to harmful instructions and stronger sycophantic tendencies. These findings suggest that H-Neurons do not simply encode factual errors, but rather represent a general tendency to prioritize conversational compliance over factual integrity.

I wonder if the same tendencies are associated in humans—and if so, is it something LLMs learned from humans, or is it a consequence of the general structure of neural networks?

“The bot ate my homework” is quickly becoming more plausible than the customary canine culprit.

Has Trump considered making the ship look like a big horse?

I suspect that if Gen Z designed their own cognitive tests, their tests would determine that we older generations were less cognitively capable than them.

The reality is that every generation adapts in different ways to fit their own cognitive circumstances, and one generation’s metric is at best an imperfect match for another—“cognitive capacity” can’t be objectively measured.

The primary outcome was dementia, which was identified via death records and physician diagnoses.

If caffeine has enough of an effect to change a diagnosis or death record, that seems worth reporting in any case.

And while it might be worthwhile to see if other stimulants have a similar effect, does it affect these results one way or the other?

You express your like or dislike toward the sentiment expressed by the post, not the thing(s) mentioned in the post.

As an example, imagine a post with a title like “AI is awful” (I’m sure many here has seen posts like that). A Friendica user could reasonably agree with the post and thus “Dislike” it. As in, they also find AI awful and they dislike AI, so they dislike the post, to show their disapproval of AI.

I don’t believe dislikes are meant to function like that on any platform.

deleted by creator

deleted by creator

It doesn’t necessarily sound like the FAA’s concerns were petty.

Sporting events existed for thousands of years before advertising—don’t mistake current conditions for necessary ones.

Section 1983 and Section 1985 of the Civil Rights Act stipulate that a person may be liable for violating constitutional rights, even if they’re not a state or local government employee, if they conspired with state or local employees.

So local law enforcement agencies assisting ICE may actually be setting them up for lawsuits?

The title has nothing to do with the linked article. Did you mean to link to this?

https://twin-cities.umn.edu/news-events/goats-can-play-role-multi-pronged-restoration-buckthorn-invaded-woodlands