The study did not present the dogs with samples from “years before” and did not have an accuracy of 98%. It had a sensitivity (percent of positive samples called positive) of 70% for one dog and 80% for the other. Their specificity (percent of negative samples called negative) was 90% and 98%.
Since there were 60 positive samples and 40 negative samples, their accuracies were 82% and 91%, respectively.
Not 98%. And with samples from patients currently diagnosed (or controls).
It does, because it’s implicit in “shoot all Fascists” that agreeing with the policy might one day get you shot for thoughtcrime.
The linked article says nothing about heavy metals. It’s about using solar power to produce hydrogen.
Here’s what I see: World-first green hydrogen innovation wins prestigious Climate Innovation Challenge
It’s common for headlines to leave out articles. It can be read the way intended. Would be nice to include “a,” but not devastating.
r/globaljewishconspiracy
It’s because the understatement came from the paper and the bullshit came from the science reporter.
“Has the potential to contribute…” Wow. Amazing.
Oh, absolutely. There is still quality science being done. But the increase in volume is aided by trash journals since the bar is so low to publish in them.
Owning the rights to copy and distribute your own creative works = imperialism
Add to that journals that will print anything as long as the fees are paid.
The doctors are in on it too!
Not just in the Congo but the Mojave Desert in California, too?
Press ‘x’ to doubt AnimalsAroundTheGlobe.com.
https://balloon-juice.com/2025/05/17/chasing-the-electric-pangolin-open-thread/
Edit: LOL. The site itself is obviously satire or trolling. The Pangolins are also deep in the Pacific. https://www.animalsaroundtheglobe.com/scientists-identify-an-electric-version-of-a-pangolin-in-the-pacific-1-335784/
Lots of bootlickers on here.
Non-solar was the 2nd biggest source at 78%
If Luigi didn’t do it, why do people like him so much?
If you lost it, you should order another.
*whomever
Yeah, the headline is poorly constructed. They have more wealth than the 750M people combined.
Otherwise the headline would be like “World’s Richest Man Richer than Rest of World.”
Yeah, right. Like I’m going to believe anything the pigs say. ACAB.
“…linked to higher risk of strokes.”
No. To link it to a higher risk of strokes, you would need to find more strokes than expected in people consuming it vs those who don’t, after accounting for confounding factors.
What this study found was that human cerebral microvascular endothelial cells in culture change gene expression when exposed to the sweetener.
Prior studies suggest an epidemiological link to strokes, but the way this is reported is trash.