Archangel

So, even more evidence of insider trading? Too bad they cut funding to all the agencies responsible for dealing with this kind of corruption.

I love how they never once mention in the article that Republicans wrote the bill, proposed it, and 100% of them voted in favor of it.

But, despite all that…the headline still reads, “Democrats passed it”.

Consumers are the victims here. No one actually cares about their “feelings”.

Good thing he defunded all those regulatory agencies, then. /s

The radiation spreads backwards in time. /s

So, Greenlanders…is this your price? A one-time $10k pay-off, to purchase your loyalty to the King of America?

Well, serves them right for getting married, then. /s

I’m going with 5G towers. That makes the most sense. /s

Smartest person to put in charge of education.

I love how they just casually admit that they’re “exploring ways” to break the law.

As long as it’s peer reviewed, this is fine. If they want to try and pass off faulty research as if it were valid, then all they’re going to do is embarrass themselves.

The Constitution does not support that school of thought. It is very clear, that the rights it affords are universal and apply to everyone in the country. It says nothing about being a citizen or not.

And he wonders why people hate him? smh.

I’m pretty sure the 1st amendment nullifies this argument.

Well, yeah. It’s called “market manipulation”, and it’s usually considered illegal.

How did I not notice this before now?

So…jail?

So, this is what “draining the swamp” is supposed to look like…right?

They aren’t really “struggling to explain it”, so much as “struggling to explain it, in a way that doesn’t imply market manipulation and insider trading”. Because that IS the only rational explanation for what he’s doing.

Buy low…sell high. Somebody’s making a killing off of all this chaos, and it ain’t us.