You know what? I was so out of brain this morning I stared at that for a whole minute wondering if it was right. I write for work every goddamn day and I was like “WTF… how did I forget this. I use these words EVERY DAY.” I knew until I thought about it.
I almost looked it up but then was like… no, 50/50 shot and everyone will know what I mean. No one will point it out.
It’s almost like outside factors may effect someone’s health and wellbeing.
I’ve read plenty of specific papers on the subject of menstrual cycles and effects of hormones and, in short, well, you’re kinda full of shit. I don’t think you know what a menstrual cycle or hormones actually are, and I don’t think you’ve read tons and tons of studies on how hormones affect our bodies. Because you’re just kind of explaining being a person. Those are the things that hormones affect for everyone, every day. And women do not have more of them than men.
I wish they had those same ethics with my first birth control when I was hospitalized with severe depression. I wasn’t even told it was a side effect. Ten years later there was a class action lawsuit and it was discontinued.
Considering men default humans and women an “other,” is the exact bias that has held back medical care for half the fucking population.
Everyone’s hormones are always in flux, every day. Eating food can drastically affect your hormones. Aerobic excercise can affect your hormones. Men have hormonal cycles as well.
What you wrote here about costs associated with medical research on women seems paraphrased from some out-of-date medical journal. Unless menstrual cycles are being studied, you do not “have to do all kinds of correction and analyses” to make sure they’re not affecting that study. I have no idea where you heard that, and would go as far as to say you just made it up. I don’t even know where to begin with the pregnancy test thing, unless you’re thinking of only medical trials, specifically.
It was one of the worst pains I’ve ever experienced and they gave me mother fucking tylenol.
I got the IUD after twelve years of trying to convince doctors my cramps were unusually bad, and being prescribed mother fucking tylenol, for what I later learned were “muscle spasms similar to labor,” every. single. month.
The IUD helped! If you have the same, ask about a Mirena and bring a flask of something strong. Like opium.
That’s just me doing naked fart yoga because my tummy hurts.
Why the hell are you calling me out? I was complimenting the model as a statement.
I could draw genterbent sonic bukake with broken restuarant crayons and it would still be art.
In a way, even the act of gatekeeping art is kind of a performance piece. You, my friend, are an artist.
I did. Specifically this part:
Im not promoting their use. They are symbols of feelings that many of us are having right now. Just like the guillotine.
But we aren’t going around building guillotines. At present, Ive not seen any riots in the U.S nor use of either of these except on Nazi cars on dealership lots.>>
How dare someone make art that represents their feelings toward current events.
Lies! He’s just a regular wolf!
Is this some kind of physicist meta joke? The article itself is an example of choosing and honing information to prove a theory.
Thanks for pointing this out. I usually read articles on mobile so I was able to find a feature I didn’t know about. For anyone else on android: https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/view-articles-reader-view-firefox-android
Is this an angelfire website in the 90’s? Who the hell thought a background amalgamation of moving images was the best way to present printed media?
I just can’t with these websites anymore. I find it almost impossible to read when there’s a embedded video as it is.
Sounds like you don’t even have to do anything to make it dangerous. Heck, let’s just chuck broken microwaves at the Teslas.
Speak for yourself. Gimme that drama free dick.
A good friend compliments your outfit. A best friend says you’re too old to be wearing tripp jeans.
If we don’t want to be embarrassed about who we hang out with, we gotta be dicks sometimes.
I liked Windows 97.
The title is accurate, but the article doesn’t really provide explanations beyond personal anecdotes. The few quotes and concepts are gestured to, rather than used to build an argument.
The comparison to greenhouse gas warnings came out of left field since they didn’t bring up any direct relationship between the two subjects.
It reads like they expect readers to agree with them.
Any argument about AI and consciousness should point out the difference between “true” AI and the LLMs we’re calling AI, and how they work.
https://hackaday.com/2024/05/15/how-ai-large-language-models-work-explained-without-math/
Here’s more information on AI and consciousness:
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9582153/