I couldn’t find the article i was looking for, and it’s basically a rhetorical nswer to a rhetorical question. So, please take my cheek with a grain of salt.
“Please log onto your dumbbell account.”
The Biden administration isn’t trying to negotiate anything. It’s just trying to strike a pose to dodge the entirely deserved condemnation it’s getting for enabling a genocide while continuing to enable a genocide.
Biden may be old, but he’s doing a pretty good job of imitating Neo dodging an agents bullets right about now.
Hey, that translation sounds right to me!
I bookmarked this for reading later, so i hadn’t perused it yet. I would fall into that first category. I’m still really green in this regard. I usually spend a few years studying and learning before actually taking action, but this is all helpful info.
Thankee kind stranger!
Can you back up this claim…?
handing out weapons to civilians in order to defend the airport
You had control, right?
…RIGHT?
“I’m a simple man and i like simple pleasures.”
How do you spell “Maginot Line” in Cyrillic?
I’ve used split screen Halo to learn some completely unaware buddies about simple military strategy, such as “QUIT STANDING IN FRONT OF ME WHEN I’M HURLING GRENADES!!1!”
GREAT SUGGESTION
Diggy said the boogie
E:diggy, not doggy
I will ask again: what is the acceptable child to terrorist death ratio?
I read earlier this year that Israel considered 100 civilian deaths for one Hamas fighter a fair trade. I can’t find the exact article, but it was about their use of AI in deciding targets. According to this article a “10% failure rate” is totally acceptable. So, anywhere between 9-1 and 100-1 is within parameters. Children are a points multiplier.
Agenda