CosmicTurtle0 [he/him]

Migrated account from @CosmicTurtle@lemmy.world

  • 3 Posts
  • 1.22K Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: April 9th, 2024

help-circle
  • The Acquired podcast went over this history very briefly in their Epic episode and it’s so crazy how close we were to having universal healthcare.

    Tl;dl:

    • during WW2, wage controls were in place due to a large demand of workers but very few people available due to being in the war
    • unions and companies alike were looking for ways to make their positions and companies more attractive.
    • government permitted benefits to augment salaries. Some companies started offering health insurance.
    • back then going to the doctor was NOT the bankrupt causing thing that is today and was considered a fringe benefit
    • larger companies were able to offer better incentives due to healthcare benefits
    • add a few years of corruption and “market forces” and you have the system we have now

    So blame wage controls during WW2.

    Oh and the Brits were facing similar forces when they were starting to stand up their healthcare system but decided instead to hire people to build a robust system so everyone didn’t have to pay anything at the point of sale.

    Yeah, it really was that simple.










  • There is a right way to do this and a wrong way. I’ve seen it done the wrong way plenty of times but I’ve also seen this done the right way.

    Most recently, there was a push to get rid of Microsoft Word, etc. and we were moving to Google Workplace.

    They made it clear that there would be training available throughout the transition and that approvals for exceptions would require division head sign off (essentially the VP).

    The day of, there were signs everywhere for how to get help. Extra people were hired to help people migrate. They were trained to get people out of Microsoft and into Drive. Prizes for best report. Slack channels, office hours, helpdesk, and even in person questions.

    Company put their money where their mouth was.

    It was the best case I saw of a company actually understanding how much of a pain it was going to be and doing what they could to lessen the burden.

    Compare that to another company I worked with that went from Macs to PC. “You figure it out.” And IT support went off-shore.

    So yeah I get where you’re coming from. But if an IT department handled a roll out the right way, I would volunteer for help desk.




  • Honestly, this is such a great idea. Get the IT team to create a bootable distro with all the apps the average user needs. Have a video they can watch to get the basics down, have IT available to install one-off software.

    At the end of the week give people the choice to keep going or go back to Windows/Mac and get feedback.

    Try again in a couple of quarters.

    Most people use web-based apps anyway.






  • It looks like they left because they were no longer getting engagement. Not because “it was the right decision”.

    I’m glad they made the decision and I get their rationale for staying on other fascist platforms. But let’s not let go of the fact that they would have stayed on twitter if they still had engagement.

    Doing the right thing would have been “we know our work is important and we are encouraging our large and active audience to leave twitter and follow us to mastodon. In fact we put together a great blog post on how to make this easy for you.”

    Instead this reads as a whiney post about how Musk is minimizing their exposure, which, fair. But still they are trying to make it mean something more than it actually is.