I’m sure the FEC will jump right on that.
I’m sure the FEC will jump right on that.
It’s making fun of gamers. “Putting females in a game that aren’t huge breasted fan service is woke”.
ACAB, but you can hardly get upset about this case. Of all the shady things the FBI does, this doesn’t even register.
Nobody said the title said that was the reason. If you’re going to be pedantic, at least be consistent.
Journalistic ethics means disclosing this sort of thing. It probably is good to point out, just so that norms don’t get completely forgotten, but, yeah, this shouldn’t surprise anyone.
Posting Stein’s tweet is a good burn, but not much more.
Applying Stein’s logic to herself: what did she do to “earn” David Duke’s endorsement? That’s easy: she backed Palestine over Israel. Even if a racist happens to agree, that doesn’t make that stance wrong.
“Palestinian journalist has violent clash with rubber bullet.”
I refuse to believe anyone is laughing at Rob Schneider.
When I look at the “pro Trump side” I see made up nonsense and impossible conspiracy theories. When I look at the anti Trump side I see videos of Trump talking.
The video on cancel looks like QVC. The “Trump Combat Knife” and banner promoting patriotaddictdeals.com just sum up the Republican party so well.
I go to Rallies with presidential candidates to listen to music and form my political opinions by listening to DJs.
How little empathy can a human being have?
Nobody snatches defeat from the jaws of victory like a Democrat.
That looks so much like a scam. Granted, the line is paper thin.
Jesus Christ. Read whatever it was one more time, buddy.
a candidate should work to appeal to 100% of their voter base
Less a proposal and more of a fact: People won’t vote for a candidate who does not support the issues that they support. You can’t expect a voter who is against fracking to vote for a candidate who supports fracking.
If Kamala supports fracking and the majority of voters do not, it is up to her to change, not the voters.
i consider this a voter skill issue
Yeah… Democrats want to blame the voters so they can continue to court wealthy donors. If everyone in Michigan promises to “Vote Blue No Matter Who” then they can continue arming Israel without losing any Muslim votes. Unfortunately that’s not how things work.
What an odd question. As usual, Democrats won with a diverse voting bloc because the majority of white people voted for Republicans.
It took me about 20 seconds to find that 39% of white women voted for Obama. Why didn’t you research that before commenting?
I really am shocked that “White women vote for Republicans” is somehow surprising, but that drives home the point I’ve been making this whole time.
i mean that’s a fair statement, but she wouldn’t be running on fracking if she thought it was detrimental, so it’s either not a huge concern for most voters, or there is something more than being let on in the rhetoric here.
You’re begging the question here. If Democrats paid attention to their voters we wouldn’t be having this conversation. Generally, critics of Dem strategy believe that they are too beholden to wealthy donors.
Democrats blame Jill Stein for Clinton’s loss. But Dems can’t force her not to run again, or people not to vote for her. If Kamala doesn’t win, it will be because she didn’t convince enough people to vote for her, not because Jill Stein is running.
The signal to noise ratio is so low these days. There’s so much information out there but everyone wants to profit from you before you can get it. Even worse, the people with good information generally can’t buy as big a megaphone as the people who profit from lying to you.
Honestly, I think humans have been more likely to believe an easy lie than a hard truth all along, but it’s easier than ever these days.
I hope that every Republican angry that a Democrat might do something good steps on a LEGO tonight.