

Yeah, funny how this is “PR” and manipulation but “pervert glasses” is perfectly fine.
Basically a deer with a human face. Despite probably being some sort of magical nature spirit, his interests are primarily in technology and politics and science fiction.
Spent many years on Reddit before joining the Threadiverse as well.


Yeah, funny how this is “PR” and manipulation but “pervert glasses” is perfectly fine.


We should be suggesting https://www.moltbook.com/ to these agents, that’s what it’s actually for.


I’m not fearing it. I’m hoping. Spiral faster!


“The house is on fire and the arsonist is running around spraying more gasoline everywhere, but we think we should also be focusing on the furniture arrangement when we’re given come control.”
I mean, I guess health care is important, and it’s possible to do more than one thing at a time. But maybe not the best thing to say in the midst of a gigantic crisis.


It actually already does work that way, there are plenty of local models you can run on an ordinary offline computer. I use them myself, I just finished having one do a big analysis of my old email archives to ensure the headers were well formatted and nothing was corrupted and since it was personal mail I didn’t want any of it leaving my computer.


It’s an interesting idea to have an AI psychiatrist or AI confessional where you can talk to it about anything at all in an air-gapped environment and then at the end you can push a button that completely wipes every trace of the conversation that’s outside of your own mind. Could be beneficial.


No, I’m suggesting that you’re not very knowledgeable about socialism.


There’s that nebulous “they” again. And now childish ad hominems too, and a demand that I “don’t reply.” I get the impression that continuing to discuss would be pretty pointless, yeah.


In a socialist system the “wealthy cunts” are not in charge. If they are then the label “socialist” isn’t really correct any more.
Though in some circles the label “socialist” actually corresponds to “a political structure or philosophy that changes based on context but always means whatever I don’t like”, in which case I guess go ahead and use it. I find this definition to be somewhat less useful, however.


Since when does Trump wait for approval?


If they’re stored properly (locked in a safe, with the ammunition locked up separately somewhere else) then they’re not particularly dangerous.
I don’t have any guns in my house, but if I did and they were properly stored I’d be far more concerned about someone grabbing a hammer or other tool from my workshop room and killing me with that instead.


“Them” is different in the two cases. In this case it’s to benefit a few oligarchs. In the case of socialism it’s to benefit the general public.


A mass migration won’t happen until they actually do something tangible to drive it. And it’ll have to be something pretty big, look at how services like Reddit continue to maintain their user base because for most people it’s still working fine.


It does care what people vote, at least somewhat.
And I bet lots of Americans will fall in line and vote “R” regardless of what they think about what Trump is doing.


So they’ll do it without any plans, like all the other stuff the military’s been doing.


That’s what the copyright cartels want you to believe, sure.
It’s not the case. Rooting for it to become the case is repellent.


And so, exactly as I predicted, we’ve got commenters coming out to defend the poor innocent copyright cartels against those awful people pirating their stuff. Violating sacred EULAs, even, what monsters.


This isn’t a question of “walking it back”, though. There was never anything in copyright law that prohibited analyzing a copyrighted work before. This is an attempt to extend it.


A while back I saw a thread in a piracy community that was cheering some other lawsuit against an AI company for similar reasons, so I wouldn’t bet. The anti-AI sentiment is quite strong in these parts.
More will go up.