A trump win represents a faster and larger right shift, with judicial and electoral erosions, reducing the chance of future progress.

As discussion, I’m not her base. But I argue about voting strategy with a Harris conclusion.

I’m deeply unsatisfied with the democratic position on Gaza and beyond. But I’m in the anti trump base. I believe global well being, including in Gaza will be significantly worse if he gets a second term.

I will vote for any competitive, viable candidate that is left of trump, the more left the better. I will not vote for an academic choice that has no chance of winning, and is only a spoiler. Without ejection reform, and something like proportional representation, I believe one should choose based on harm reduction, even if the choice is very unsavory.

Thanks for posting why, I think it’s good to see the reason in the comments, not just the log

Obviously the biggest way to reduce impact is to not exist, and certainly not reproduce.

Mind, I’m not pointing that phrase at you, I’m speaking about any human.

Voting rights =/= dietary choices.

One thing is others imposing a lack of autonomy on others (not allowing certain people to vote)

The other thing is a personal choice that no one is stopping you from making.

It’s called the Atlantic/Pacific oceans sport

Hah it’s already sensitized https://lemm.ee/comment/15063493

Eh they know they live in a very precarious perch with a population that young and disenfranchised. It’s classic authoritarian tactics to make a token nod to the masses every now and again

Interview fast. Leave without notice. (Drop your equipment off of course).

The company is actively harming you. You don’t have to be nice as you get away

You really aren’t capable of actual discussion huh? Just loops and loops. You haven’t addressed the core point at all.

Edit when given the chance to discuss or clarify your position on an actual topic you just retreat to the same old lines.

Out of decorum, please note I made an edit which discuss the relationship between conservative judicial appointments and the core socialist base: the working class and the disenfranchised. I believe your comment came across while I was editing.

I’m not discussing voting strategy in this thread as you and I have discussed it before. I’m specifically discussing the content of your above comment, which you repeated, which indicates your comfortability with another trump term. I highlighted a consequence of that, which you have not addressed, and have continually tried to derail back to voting freedoms.

Edit Im not implying anything, I’m reviewing literal repeated language from you that suggests no care about at risk folks

Which means, if you’ve taken the conversation this far, that you aren’t for roe v Wade, and are pro conservative judicial activism from the bench.

Edit judicial conservatism is literally the tip of the spear of Christiofascist nationalism… One of the worst enemies of immigrants, at risk groups, and the working class in general.

Pretty incongruous with being a socialist.

I don’t know why you keep bringing up voting. I’m not discussing that

Covered in ectoplasmic goo

You said you’re ok with another trump term and I highlighted a concrete consequence of that. This isn’t about voting, it’s about what you’re ok with.

Edit based on your own words, you are at least neutral, if not accepting of the type of policy and appointments trump makes. That’s the mask off. You said you aren’t afraid, suggesting you are positioned to not be materially impacted by trump, which is the privilege component.

I’ve made no comment on anything beyond what you’ve posted, and have not suggested you don’t deserve to vote for whoever you like. Im discussing the content of your comment.

That you are comfortable with conservative judicial appointments and the influence and consequences that represents. You said as much by saying you are ok with another trump term, and his judicial appointments are not some myth or fearmonger story, they actually happened and that’s the track record.

Seriously. It’s all shit posting and vidya until legal council from a multinational corporation is knocking at your door.

I love all the comments implying this dude is a coward. Total armchair shit

I honestly think it would be boarded and detained.

I’m not claiming the US is comparatively virtuous, I just don’t think they’d sink trade ships. Warships? Yeah.

Not relevant but cool. That’s pretty much all you say.

You already showed your hand

You’ve completely departed from the original topic, and the topic of this post, so I’m not following.