Which gives superficial comfort as it gives scant protection from how aggregate data is used to upend democracy.

Wonder if the BBC will describe the much higher number of daily murders in Gaza as waves of executions?

“Chinese authorities have far-reaching access rights to personal data within the sphere of influence of Chinese companies,” she added.

And that’s different to American companies how? None of this climate of data harvesting is currently good for us.

Temples of Ur!!! Obviously it’s been Uranium all this time.

What is it with racist settler colonists that they love their triumphalist parades so much? Are they just bad people?

Capitalist realism is a hell of a cult.

So the title should say that right wing and centrist sources are less factual than left wing ones.

A general strike is your only hand. So start prepping for that.

deleted by creator

Henrys here! Almost…

deleted by creator

I could swear I heard that whole ACER laptop angle a couple of months ago on someone else’s podcast. I don’t want to say verbatim but I was having severe dejayvu. It wasn’t a Doctorow podcast that much I’m sure.

Extra points for not lifting the spagetti pile when you’re hovering.

That reads like exactly how republicans describe democrats. Can you not see how far to the right you have strayed?

One sure thing about that shitstain Trump is that he is bribable. He will pivot on a pinhead if it would enrich him more.

The deeper reason is that they believe in a highly hierarachical society in which they have earned the right to be in the top strata. That’s why they chase the big donors. That’s why their calculations will always put themselves and their grip on power above: the basic needs of impoverished Americans; or the lives of innocent civilians getting bombed out of existance; or future generations that will inherit our strung out eco system; and about countless other maladies and evils that beset our tettering civilisation.

They are not leftwing, they are the corporate bulwark against leftwing ideas. They are not big tent, they promulgate a very narrow reading of reality to the benefit of their paymasters.

I think this is a bit naive. Both partys will have done their homework and have a fairly good idea what it is those disenfranchised voters want. The problem is is what they want is at odds with what the party’s big donors want.

100%

At the time maybe, but a lot of smaller details such as this will become much more important later on when the dust settles. So, why not write it up now so that ot can be revisited later on. It’s not as if there’s a limit to the number of acticles they can publish.