

And we never will, because of the fundamental ways the technology works. LLMs needs nondeterminism in order to function. It’s truly a black box, which makes it a nonstarter in any discipline that demands accuracy and integrity and repeatability.
People keep asking me, and I haven’t really had an answer, but now yeah, I’m thinking I’m back.


And we never will, because of the fundamental ways the technology works. LLMs needs nondeterminism in order to function. It’s truly a black box, which makes it a nonstarter in any discipline that demands accuracy and integrity and repeatability.


I would definitely put Evangelion on that list, especially if you have no familiarity with mecha.


Would a pihole have any effect on ads served in this manner?


Billions of agents doing what?
Spending your money of course!
But in all seriousness, people like Jensen Huang are salivating over the day that they can take money directly out of our savings accounts. AI can’t do even a fraction of what he claims it’s able to do, but as long as he can sell us the illusion of a functional product, he believes it is his right to use that illusion to extract wealth from us.
Billionaires.


At the end of the day you’re user base isn’t going to be “AI” agents
Unless you’re Nvidia, who would love to sell their GPUs to a captive audience of agents that control all the capital in the economy.
https://techcrunch.com/2026/05/20/jensen-huang-says-hes-found-a-brand-new-200b-market-for-nvidia/
:^)


Keep up with who? Developing good software is not a race, unless you’re a corporation.
I meant for the rest of the people in this thread lol
I was about to say I was absolutely shocked at the number of 90s and early 2000s games among the answers here. Everybody in this threat is really showing their age lol
Descent 2 is a deep cut.
Disturbing lack of Nier Automata itt.
Jedi Knight
A human of culture.


Will you accept a $20,000 a year salary without dental and vision?


It removes any creativity I have in the process. Complex decision making is no longer mine, the only say I have is Accept or Reject (and Roll Again). It’s soul crushing because entire process now has no soul.
And my coworkers who have bought in completely are now so lazy they don’t even call in to meetings anymore, they don’t answer questions, they let AI run the entire SDLC. When they get replaced by some MBA who knows how to hit the same buttons, they will be completely blindsided. And they will have nobody to blame but themselves.


Not really? Dubs can change between the original airing and the physical release, for example when a VA is on vocal rest and they need a backup. Clifford Chapin voiced for the broadcast, as heard in this video, and Aaron Dismuke re-recorded his lines for the Blu Ray later.
In this instance, if I had to guess, the latin dubbers made a mistake and needed to redo those lines to match the rest of the international versions. Maybe they were using the manga as their source for some lines, but I doubt it was some principled stand.


Oh hey welcome back Machine. Wanna talk about this again? Or should we wait for Walters and his ad hominems?
Yes, the Japanese dub fictionalized the names of some countries (not even all of them, the screenshot here literally says Japón). Yes, that was a change from the manga. Yes, this probably caused a bunch of confusion for the various dubbing and subbing contractors who were tasked with localizing the show to their language. Is all this really a malicious conspiracy to obscure Israel’s ongoing genocide? Or does Hanlon’s Razor apply?


I’ll give you that on Biden but nuh uh on Yang.
On February 17, 2022, Yang announced the launch of a Web3 community whose membership token fees would be used to fund lobbying work on behalf of Web3, blockchain, and cryptocurrency interests on Capitol Hill.[64]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrew_Yang
Ideologically, Forward is populist and reformist, and a representative of centrism in the United States. It considers itself to be the center within the American political spectrum, although the party has also been described as big tent or syncretic due to its unwillingness on holding any firm stances or positions,[4]
Through the same process of non-determinism I just described. Lawyers asked ChatGPT to find cases so they could be cited in their arguments, and it gave them “sources” that were just bupkis.
It’s the same chat window, going to the same flawed machine. If you doubt the machine the first time, what makes you want to trust it the second or third time?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mata_v._Avianca,_Inc.
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-65735769