![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.ca/pictrs/image/7b0211f0-7266-4e13-9d26-8c3e6126af62.png)
I’m amazed that for exactly this product they have not announced Copilot integration (yet)
I’m amazed that for exactly this product they have not announced Copilot integration (yet)
If I copy McDonald’s site one by one for my own restaurant and just change the name, you can expect to be sued.
And yet, their site is available publicly?
By your logic they shouldn’t be broken because it’s the competitors’ fault if people don’t do business with them instead.
Yes exactly, that’s why they shouldn’t be broken.
They’re consumer friendly and are not taking specific action to BE a monopoly, contrary to many other companies.
There’s also enough competition and it’s exactly their fault that they fail/refuse to implement what makes Steam so popular.
I’m definitely against monopolies, but mindlessly slapping rules on them just because they’re labeled monopolies is some of the dumbest shit I’ve heard
Not necessarily true
How does that “garbage” affect update time?
I still don’t see how that makes Firefox difficult.
The transition might be difficult, but I rarely see casual people use the options you describe.
It’s as easy as opening the shortcut and start browsing, I see no difference with Chrome there
Why would Firefox be difficult to use?
I think they’re down voting because, no, the singularity is not approaching at blistering speed.
Pretty much everyone here agrees that it’s a shitty concept. Doesn’t solve anything and it’s a privacy nightmare.
No, you have it the other way around. It means copyright owners can share “corrupted” versions of their works and the AI can still use it. Possible AI leaks won’t return the original work, since it was never used.
Of course I think this is only one aspect of why artists wouldn’t share their works, but it’s not the point the paper is trying to make. They’re just giving an aspect of how it could be useful.
Qwant uses their own index, but supplements it with Bing if they don’t have enough info (or for images).
It’s not what the paper is about at all, seems this is just shit journalism again.
All the paper says about copyright is that this method is more secure because AI can sometimes spit out training examples.
I think you are a bit confused about the E-mail structure.
Everything behind the @ is the domain, on your case “domain.com” Before the @ is just a name that can be used as you, the domain owner, wants.
If you want to redirect all mail to yourname@domain.com, that’s very easy to do AND you can still see the original e-mail address these nails were sent to.
So I assume for example Dropbox sent some commercial mail about current offers. Using that, he knew the old account and that it was signed up to Dropbox
It’s from an Apple commercial, which was an allusion to 1984
Kagi is great, but I just can’t miss $5 a month for it.
I’m using Qwant now and it’s pretty good.
Not videogames, but the idea that a car should also be a video game console sounds very childish.
Old railway lines in Europe often aren’t complete anymore and only cover relatively small distances.
There simply isn’t enough infrastructure to handle a full train network and fixing them up would probably require existing infrastructure and buildings to be disowned and destroyed.
The wheel is just there during the testing phase as a backup, seems the final pods don’t have it, as it would make the idea useless.
And there’s the problem. Why should Hamas be called a terrorist and not the Israel government?
This is why news organisations avoid the word. It clearly picks a side.
He’s not blind! What’s he supposed to do with such a dumb feature?? /s