Amazing, will check’em out later!

Does the “us” in the graph imply that carnists lost a significant amt of brain size?

I see also you have cranked up a few side accounts to upvote yourself.

lmao got me Mr. Soft Rock 🤡

I will just leave this without further comment, people reading your “contributions” can make up their own mind as to your credibility and whether or not it is I who has the agenda.

Edit: For people actually interested in the science, here’s an interesting example of what opportunistic-carnivorous feeding would’ve looked like – underscoring the absurdity of talking about meat-eating in terms of preference in an anthropological/survival context.

Indeed. Mine include having a MSc. in Molecular Biology, yours, trolling on the internet

I just fail to see how eating meat is an inherent “preference” while eating plants is “opportunistic”. Seems like a false dichotomy

ITER, set to be the largest fusion reactor ever built, will be a tokamak.

Terribly reductive take. There’s a myriad of different edible plant species, variably digestible and non-digestible for different species. This article outlines how the reconstructed mouth microbiom of human ancestors as far back as 100’000 years ago was already capable of breaking down starchy foods. With the advent of fire, those would’ve been cooked just like meats and would’ve facilitated a growth in brain all the same, while being more reliable a food source.