• 0 Posts
  • 141 Comments
Joined 11 months ago
cake
Cake day: August 14th, 2024

help-circle


  • This is a trademark dispute. This is why it’s filled with the USPTO as opposed to a court case. Bar for this is way, way lower. Sony has an incredibly good chance to prevail. Sony winning here at the USPTO would deny a trademark for Naughty Cat. But if there is a decent rebuttal from the studio, it may have to go to court to be settled.

    That said, Naughty Cat is likely doing exactly what Sony details in their complaint. As the publisher’s works are mostly cheap slot machine themed games.

    Naughty Cat only has two apps listed on the App Store, and both are gambling games that promise real cash rewards.

    It’s very likely this is one of those cheap Chinese drive by studios and it pinged on Sony’s radar a lot earlier than the studio thought it would.

    But motions of opposition are not the same as a full blown suit in Court. So Sony does have an incredibly good chance to have their trademark invalided.


  • Exactly. That’s the issue I keep trying to tell others about social media. It is insanely easy to run bot accounts with a very minimal amount of something like Python programming. And even if that’s not your cup of tea, you can just literally have a half dozen people very easily log in and out of six fold the number of actual humans accounts.

    Like for six people, running 60 to 80 fake account manually is a piece of cake and if they’re really good and focused on task, that can easily be 150 to 200 accounts manually ran. Like running a bot army is incredibly easy for anyone.

    This is why you have to take a lot of social media with a massive grain of salt. A lot of people are out there playing the algorithm, way more than I think people give credit for.









  • However, I thought that the infrastructure would be set up prior for small business to come back to America and manufacture in America. So to wish ill on someone and to love the fact that they’re suffering, to love the fact that their family is being negatively affected, because I didn’t vote the same way that you did is [expletive] up

    This guy is a double idiot. That he would think the manufacturing would be around before the tariffs went into place. it’s just silly thinking.

    But also that he believes “go woke, go broke” isn’t the exact same thing he’s facing, is a whole other level of ignorance.

    There’s no way this person isn’t just rage bait. No one could truly be this fucking regraded. I refuse to believe there are people this genuinely ignorant who aren’t just out there for rage bait.



  • You’re mostly right in that the person you’re replying is missing that we are providing money for those people’s detention. But El Salvador doesn’t HAVE TO give the person back, there’s nothing outside of us stopping payments that compels them.

    It’s a semantic difference indeed but goes to point out the difference between legal means and diplomatic means. Legally, there’s nothing the US can do, once the person is in El Salvador they are under that country’s legal system. Diplomatically, yes, absolutely we can ask El Salvador to hand the person back or there will be diplomatic and potentially economic consequences for not doing so.

    Now as others have pointed out, the Executive branch has a wide latitude for diplomatic powers. Judge indicated that the President work diplomatically to bring the person home, but outside of that, the “or else” part. There’s not much the Judge can do past that.

    Additionally, El Salvador could press charges on the person and then there would be nothing that can be done to bring the person home in any legal means and likely less so diplomatically. This is the issue with sending people there. President Bukele of El Salvador could wish for better diplomatic relationships with the United States and Trump and just invent charges to keep the person there forever. There’s literally nothing we can do is El Salvador indicates that they are keeping the person and there’s nothing in the court system that can compel anyone to make those reasons clear.

    That’s the biggest thing about the difference between diplomatic and legal. In legal means, the Court system can ensure that people are following through on requirements. In a diplomatic means, it’s just depends on who can butter who’s biscuit the best. The Judge can tell the President to bring him back, but that means next to nothing when it comes to diplomatic matters.



  • President Trump will impose a 10% tariff on all countries

    It’s just whatever at this point. Clearly he’s gunning for recession, fuck it. Nobody in Congress stopping him.

    At this point all those emergency powers Congress has given the President since the 1920s needs to be pulled back because clearly we can no long assure that the President won’t declare everything an emergency.