This comment was reported as homophobic.

I believe the meaning of the comment to be

Republicans projecting - again

Leaving it up for @Korkki@lemmy.ml to clarify.

I have worked for non-profits.

They are completely allowed to make a profit.

You are mistakenly under the impression that I’m against Mozilla.

If you go back to my original comment, I merely explained what I explained here. Mozilla is a non-profit, not a not-for-profit.

You decided to take that as an attack on Mozilla, for some strange reason, and attacked me. I just turned that same energy back on you.

Did I ever attack Mozilla? Did you attack me?

I couldn’t agree more

I only use Firefox. I’ve only used Firefox since 2000.

They, by their own statements, are a 501( C )3, which is a non-profit, not a not-for-profit.

Sit down.

Non-profit isn’t the same as not-for-profit

Take American Red Cross

They make bank on blood donations. Also, they take in way more than they put out.

non-exclusive

That means we can license all our content to another company, and Reddit would be forced to allow them to fetch it, as we still own it, right?

Seriously impressed your still doing this

Not as much as you’d think.

Parent bullet point is the user. Child bullet points are communities they run/ran

• https://hilariouschaos.com/u/universalmonk
• https://futurology.today/u/universalmonk
• https://lemdro.id/u/universalmonk
• https://lemmy.libertarianfellowship.org/u/universalmonk
• https://lemmy.radio/u/universalmonk
• https://eviltoast.org/u/universalmonk
• https://sh.itjust.works/u/universalmonk
  • https://sh.itjust.works/c/talesfromthecrypticlemmy
  • https://sh.itjust.works/c/swp
  • https://sh.itjust.works/c/pierpontctc
  • https://sh.itjust.works/c/politicsunfiltered
  • https://sh.itjust.works/c/solarpunkstrength
  • https://sh.itjust.works/c/fitchicks
  • https://sh.itjust.works/c/lostscreams
  • https://sh.itjust.works/c/libertariansocialism
  • https://sh.itjust.works/c/esperanto
• https://slrpnk.net/u/universalmonk
  • https://slrpnk.net/c/solarpunkstrength
• https://mander.xyz/u/universalmonk
• https://midwest.social/u/universalmonk (BANNED)
  • https://midwest.social/c/talesfromthecrypticlemmy
• https://lemm.ee/u/universalmonk
  • https://lemm.ee/c/talesfromthedark
  • https://lemm.ee/c/swp
  • https://lemm.ee/c/pierpontctc
  • https://lemm.ee/c/byupathway
  • https://lemm.ee/c/byuidaho
  • https://lemm.ee/c/politicsunfiltered
• https://beehaw.org/u/universalmonk (BANNED)
• https://lemmy.world/u/universalmonk (BANNED)
  • https://lemmy.world/c/politicsunfiltered (TAKEN OVER BY ANOTHER MOD)
  • https://lemmy.world/c/PierpontCTC
  • https://lemmy.world/c/transracial
  • https://lemmy.world/c/byupathway
  • https://lemmy.world/c/byuidaho
  • https://lemmy.world/c/swp
  • https://lemmy.world/c/talesfromthecrypticlemmy
  • https://lemmy.world/c/amileaday
  • https://lemmy.world/c/murderhornet_100

After reviewing the actual legal filing, you’re correct. I somehow missed that.

All persons (corporate or individual) in the United States who participated in an Affiliate Program with a United States online merchant and had affiliate attribution redirected to Paypal as a result of the Honey browser extension.

Thanks for the clarification.

The YouTubers can only sue for actual damages THEY realized.

As the class is for content creators that partnered with Honey, it can only be for the affiliate links.

Users will need to sue separately, either individually or as a different class. My money is on them having a forced arbitration clause, so direct lawsuit will most likely be out of the question.

It’s a neat idea, but why not ncdu?

Generally, no.

Valve just isn’t my enemy.

We have a ton of the free games. They give away a bunch to get you to use them.

Never paid for one from them, though.

If your enemy is going to help you beat them, let them.

Sorry for the confusion. I was referencing this comment:

Your fanclub doesn’t represent a significant demographic

Most every group that’s not Republican or Democrat is in that boat. Not enough people to even get recognized. Very seldom do we see others even get a seat at the table.

We can say the same about Stein.

I’ve not used that in years. Didn’t even know it was still around.

I am grateful for it being public

I made a statement, not a claim. My statement was that the green party has not won a presidency. You demanded I provide evidence. I was merely showing you how silly that request was.

Your statement was a bad faith argument, and had been reported as such.

Let’s flip the script. Please provide evidence the green party has won a presidency, or there strong evidence they will this cycle.